
Jefferson Graham runs down the winners and losers of CES 2018. USA TODAY
LAS VEGAS—The least popular gadget in the news last week—and the latest shopper-beware lesson from the tech industry—may have been a single device in a corner of a Kodak exhibit at the CES convention here.
That rectangular gadget was a high-powered computer made to “mine” Bitcoin by performing the increasingly intense calculations that generate more of the digital currency.
By itself, Bitcoin has already earned a bit of a toxic reputation for such traits as its extreme instability, the growing number of scams targeting the Bitcoin-curious, and its status as the currency of ransomware. But wait, there’s more.
The former photography giant had put this machine on display to attract renters, not buyers. A Kodak licensee called Spotlite USA would have you pay $3,400 for two years’ use of one of these contraptions, housed at a facility near Kodak’s Rochester, N.Y. offices. In return, Spotlite would keep half of all the Bitcoins it generated over that time.
More: Kodak shares have more than tripled since announcing new cryptocurrency 'KodakCoin'
More: Kodak creating KodakCoin, develops its own cryptocurrency system
In a conversation on the show floor Thursday, Spotlite CEO Halston Mikail put that as a good deal that’s already attracting customers.
"Your $3,400 becomes $9,000," he said, adding that Spotlite benefits from low electricity costs of just 4 cents per kilowatt from a local coal-fired plant.
(Your own home may have much cleaner power, but you wouldn’t want to keep a Bitcoin miner there anyway. Beyond its voracious appetite for electricity, its cooling fans make a racket that Mikail compared to having a hair dryer on high.)
The dubious math behind Spotlite’s pitch drew an extra level of scorn.
The basic problem, as BuzzFeed’s Ryan Mac explained in a post headlined “This Is Why Experts Are Calling Kodak's New Bitcoin Scheme A Scam,” is that it gets progressively more difficult to mine more bitcoin. So unless Bitcoin’s value increases far above its current level—the classic expectation behind a doomed market bubble—a renter of Kodak’s miner can’t possibly make the promised returns.
In that aspect, this Bitcoin play looks uniquely bad among gadget debuts for not just surfing on an overhyped trend but for banking on consumer innumeracy.
But in too many other ways, it fits quite well with a longstanding tradition of tech excess disconnected from real-world utility. Think of 4K screens on phones and 8K displays in TVs that pack in more resolution than human retinas can perceive at normal viewing distances. Or contemplate Apple and Google removing headphone jacks on smartphones because making a mobile device infinitesimally smaller outranks keeping a perfectly functional, universally supported connector.
More: Here's what we wanted to see from CES, but didn't
More: I just bought a 4K TV. Don't tell me 8K is coming!
More: These are the best phones that still have a headphone jack
In all these cases, the problem isn’t just tech companies selling something most people don’t need, but also the diversion of effort and expertise that could have gone into something that people actually need. For example, extremely fast computation is a lot more useful in a self-driving car that can make the roads more efficient and safer.
But as long as the gadget business stays this wide-open and this potentially lucrative, you’re going to keep seeing dubious propositions like Spotlite’s bitcoin-mining deal. When you see them, just remember to ask one simple question: What’s the actual problem you’re trying to solve here?
Posted!
A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.












































































Like this topic? You may also like these photo galleries:
1 of 100
2 of 100
3 of 100
4 of 100
5 of 100
6 of 100
7 of 100
8 of 100
9 of 100
10 of 100
11 of 100
12 of 100
13 of 100
14 of 100
15 of 100
16 of 100
17 of 100
18 of 100
19 of 100
20 of 100
21 of 100
22 of 100
23 of 100
24 of 100
25 of 100
26 of 100
27 of 100
28 of 100
29 of 100
30 of 100
31 of 100
32 of 100
33 of 100
34 of 100
35 of 100
36 of 100
37 of 100
38 of 100
39 of 100
40 of 100
41 of 100
42 of 100
43 of 100
44 of 100
45 of 100
46 of 100
47 of 100
48 of 100
49 of 100
50 of 100
51 of 100
52 of 100
53 of 100
54 of 100
55 of 100
56 of 100
57 of 100
58 of 100
59 of 100
60 of 100
61 of 100
62 of 100
63 of 100
64 of 100
65 of 100
66 of 100
67 of 100
68 of 100
69 of 100
70 of 100
71 of 100
72 of 100
73 of 100
74 of 100
75 of 100
76 of 100
77 of 100
78 of 100
79 of 100
80 of 100
81 of 100
82 of 100
83 of 100
84 of 100
85 of 100
86 of 100
87 of 100
88 of 100
89 of 100
90 of 100
91 of 100
92 of 100
93 of 100
94 of 100
95 of 100
96 of 100
97 of 100
98 of 100
99 of 100
100 of 100
Rob Pegoraro is a tech writer based out of Washington, D.C. To submit a tech question, e-mail Rob at rob@robpegoraro.com. Follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/robpegoraro.
Join the Nation's Conversation
To find out more about Facebook commenting please read the Conversation Guidelines and FAQs