Hopes for immigration deal fade as Trump declares dreamer program ‘probably dead’

Negotiators spent last week seeking a solution that would shield young immigrants brought illegally into the U.S. as children.

A group of young undocumented immigrants known as Dreamers at a rally outside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 10.
A group of young undocumented immigrants known as Dreamers at a rally outside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 10.  (ERIN SCHAFF / The New York Times)  

WASHINGTON — Prospects for a bipartisan agreement to protect young immigrants from deportation and prevent a government shutdown later this week faded Sunday as key lawmakers traded sharp accusations and U.S. President Donald Trump said hopes for a deal were “probably dead.”

Negotiators spent last week seeking a solution that would shield young immigrants brought illegally to the United States as children, including the roughly 800,000 who secured work permits under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program created under President Barack Obama.

But a tentative deal worked out Thursday by a small bipartisan group of senators crumbled in an Oval Office meeting in which, according to multiple people involved, an angry Trump asked them why the United States should accept immigrants from “shithole countries” such as Haiti, El Salvador and African nations over those from European countries such as Norway.

Trump offered a vague denial Friday, and on Sunday, he declared the talks to be failing.

“DACA is probably dead because the Democrats don’t really want it, they just want to talk and take desperately needed money away from our Military,” he said on Twitter.

Article Continued Below

Democrats have tied the immigration talks to spending negotiations being held ahead of a Friday shutdown deadline. Republicans are seeking an increase in military spending; Democrats want a DACA deal and a matching increase in non-defense funding.

Meanwhile this weekend, debate raged over what Trump said in the Thursday meeting — and whether he had said it at all.

The sole Democratic participant in the Oval Office meeting, Senate Minority Whip Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, told reporters Friday that Trump had used the vulgar word “not just once but repeatedly” during the meeting. A Republican attendee, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, issued a statement that did not specifically confirm the words used, but backed up Durbin’s account.

But one GOP participant, Sen. David Perdue of Georgia, said in an interview Sunday on ABC’s This Week With George Stephanopoulos that Trump did not use the word “shithole.”

“I’m telling you he did not use that word, George,” Perdue said, accusing Durbin of making a “gross misrepresentation” of what took place in the meeting: “It’s not the first time Senator Durbin has done it, and it is not productive to solving the problem we’re having.”

Perdue had previously issued a joint statement with Sen. Tom Cotton., another participant, saying that they did “not recall the President saying these comments specifically.”

Ben Marter, a spokesperson for Durbin, tweeted a rebuke early Sunday: “Credibility is something that’s built by being consistently honest over time,” he said. “Senator Durbin has it. Senator Perdue does not. Ask anyone who’s dealt with both.”

Read more:

Trump partly denies, but also defends controversial immigrant remarks

Q and A: David Frum on America’s ‘Trumpocracy’

Trump wants the U.S. to take in more people from Norway. But why would Norwegians want to leave home?

Another participant, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, said in an interview with Fox News Sunday that she did not “recall him using that exact phrase,” but she acknowledged he “did use and will continue to use strong language.”

Host Chris Wallace told Nielsen it “seems implausible” that she would not recall that type of comment.

“I don’t recall that specific phrase being used,” she responded. “That’s all I can say about that.”

The “shithole countries” remark has vexed Republicans, compelling many to make statements criticizing Trump for the remarks. But it has infuriated Democrats who see the comment as evidence of malicious intent in Trump’s policy-making.

“I think he is a racist,” Rep. John Lewis said on This Week. “We have to stand out; we have to speak up and not try to sweep it under the rug.”

Nielsen said that Trump is simply advocating a merit-based immigration system, similar to those in Canada and Australia. “I take a little bit of offence to the suggestion that the president is racist,” she said Sunday.

While Democrats have expressed openness to a deal that would combine legal status for “dreamers,” as the group of young immigrants brought illegally as children are known, with funding for border security measures, Republicans have tried to broaden the talks. They have targeted the abolition of a special program allowing citizens of some countries to apply for visas distributed by lottery as well as rules allowing naturalized U.S. citizens to sponsor family members for legal status — a system Republican critics refer to as “chain migration.”

The tentative deal unveiled Thursday would give legal status and a pathway to citizenship for dreamers while also providing $2.7 billion (U.S.) for border security — some of which could be used to construct the border wall Trump has proposed. The visas now offered under the lottery system would be reallocated to other immigration programs, such as one offering temporary status to citizens of nations in crisis — such as the ones Trump referenced in his Oval Office remarks.

Trump said in a second tweet Sunday that he wanted more aggressive measures in any deal: “I, as President, want people coming into our Country who are going to help us become strong and great again, people coming in through a system based on MERIT. No more Lotteries!”

Echoing dozens of Democrats, Lewis said he would not vote for any government spending measure until the dreamer issue is settled.

Republicans cannot pass a government funding bill without Democratic votes. There are 51 Senate Republicans in a chamber in which 60 votes are needed to pass major legislation, and GOP leaders are also facing problems in the House, where some Republican members have balked at the prospect of passing another stopgap that does not increase military funding.

“We must not give up or give in,” Lewis said. “We must continue to press on and get a deal.”

A federal judge in California last week halted Trump’s decision to end the DACA program and ruled that participants in the program should retain their legal status. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said late Saturday that it would resume accepting renewal requests from people who had already enrolled in the program.

But there is little indication the ruling has helped to defuse the standoff, multiple Democratic aides involved in the effort to secure a compromise said Saturday. On Sunday, the situation’s urgency had not changed. Democrats are trained on securing a legislative solution to the crisis ahead of the Friday deadline.