CJI silent, opinion divided as 4 judges publicly question SC's functioning

| Updated: Jan 12, 2018, 22:54 IST

Highlights

In an unprecedented move, four senior Supreme Court judges on Friday publicly expressed their grievances against the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra and alleged irregularities within the apex court.

A flood of reactions poured in from all quarters, but CJI Misra is yet to break his silence on the day's events.

Here are the day's top developments:
Justices Kurian Joseph, Jasti Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi and Madan Lokur at the press conference. (Reuters Photo)Justices Kurian Joseph, Jasti Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi and Madan Lokur at the press conference. (Reuters Photo)
HOW IT STARTED
1. Senior Supreme Court judges Justice Jasti Chelameswar, Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Madan Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph held a press conference, where they accused CJI Misra of not being responsive to their requests.

2. While they accepted that the move to hold a press conference was highly unusual, they said they were "left with no choice."

3. They added that they had sent the CJI a seven-page letter, to which they had not received a response, and then had met him again today morning, but in vain.

"We collectively tried to persuade the CJI that certain things aren't in order so take remedial measures but unfortunately our efforts failed," said Justice Chelameswar.

4. The judges voiced five main grievances+ :
a) Important cases get heard by the CJI-led bench, and do not get distributed to other senior judges heading benches

b) Cases with resounding consequences for the nation and its legal system were assigned by the CJI selectively - based on preference, instead of rationality

c) A public interest litigation seeking a probe into Judge BM Loya's "mysterious" death was assigned to court no. 10 and not to any of the first four benches other than the CJI-led bench

d) The medical college admissions scam was sent to court no. 7 after a bench headed by Justice Chelameswar sent it to a five-judge bench of himself, the CJI, and Justices Gogoi, Lokur and Joseph

e) They feel it was wrong on the CJI's part to head a small bench and deal with the memorandum of procedure when it was earlier heard by a five-judge bench

5. When asked if CJI Misra should be removed, one of the judges said, "Let the nation decide on his impeachment."

Read also: Full text of the letter from the senior Supreme Court judges to the CJI


HOW THE GOVERNMENT REACTED

6. Sources in the government told news agency PTI that the conflict was an "internal" matter of the judiciary. This may reflect the government's reluctance to interfere.

7. However, it is clear that the Centre wants the apex court to settle the issue at the earliest as the people's faith in the judiciary is at stake.

8. Some time later, after a meeting with the CJI, Attorney General KK Venugopal said that the press conference by the four Supreme Court Justices earlier in the day "could have been avoided."

9. He also expressed his belief that the turmoil within the top court of the land would be resolved by Saturday.

10. Minister of state for law PP Chaudhury said, "Our judiciary is reputed all over the world, is independent and will sort out the matter itself."


HOW THE OPPOSITION REACTED

11. Congress president Rahul Gandhi said that it was "important" that the judges' concerns be looked into.

"All citizens who love the idea of justice, believe in the Supreme Court, are looking at this issue. It is important that it is addressed," he said.

12. CPM general secretary Sitaram Yechury said a thorough investigation was required to understand how the independence and integrity of the judiciary was getting "affected."

13. The CPM also responded to the controversy that had broken out when its leader D Raja visited Justice Chelameswar after the press meet. It clarified Raja had met the judge in his personal capacity, not as a representative of the party, reported PTI.

Read also: What the Supreme Court rift is about


WHAT OTHER JUDGES AND LAWYERS SAID


14. PB Sawant, former Supreme Court judge: Judges had to come before media and take this unprecedented step. This means that there is a serious dispute, either with CJI or some internal dispute.


15. Ujjwal Nikam, senior lawyer: This is a black day for the judiciary. Today's press conference would cause a bad precedent. From now on every common man could look at all judicial order with suspicion. Every judgement will be questioned.




(With inputs from agencies)

Get latest news & live updates on the go on your pc with News App. Download The Times of India news app for your device.

From around the web

VIDEO: How to Thicken Your Hair (Fast)

JuveTress

Reunite With Family & Friends Using This People Search Tool

People Search

Don't Use Probiotics Before You See This

Gundry MD

More from The Times of India

After Mevani, Arvind Kejriwal's rally flops in Maharashtra

Ranbir Kapoor Varun Dhawan Arjun Kapoor Football Match

Gangster issues death threat to Salman Khan

From the Web

More From The Times of India