United States: What's The Frequency, Kenneth? How An R.E.M. Song Can Teach Workplace Violence Lessons

Last Updated: January 11 2018
Article by Travis W. Vance
Fisher Phillips LLP

What can the connection between legendary alternative rock band R.E.M. and veteran reporter Dan Rather tell us about workplace safety? Most probably didn't even realize these two popular culture figures had anything in common, or would ever guess it relates to safety. Yet, a 1986 attack on Rather while he was walking alone to his Manhattan apartment linked the former CBS Evening News anchor to a rock band from Athens, Georgia forever, and the story might help you consider helpful techniques to protect your employees from danger. 

Bizarre Workplace Violence Incident Leads To Hit Song 

What's the Frequency, Kenneth?, one of R.E.M.'s most recognized hits, was released on the band's 1994 album Monster. The song peaked at number 21 on the Billboard Hot 100, and was the first song to debut at number one on the Billboard Modern Rock Tracks list. The song's title refers to an incident in New York City in 1986 involving a bizarre attack on Rather by two men, and the lyrics include lines such as these: 

"What's the frequency, Kenneth?". . .

You said that irony was the shackles of youth

You wore a shirt of violent green, uh-huh

I never understood the frequency, uh-huh 

The assailants, who confronted the defenseless Rather as he was walking home alone, attacked the reporter on a sidewalk and then in a building lobby, all the while repeating the same words: "Kenneth, what is the frequency?'" Apparently, Rather's attackers not only wrongly believed his name was Kenneth, but also that they were being brainwashed by the news media and wanted to know the "frequency" used by Rather's television station to control their minds. American society was fascinated by the unusual attack, and especially the attackers' bizarre words, which inspired an emerging alt-rock band from Georgia to write the now infamous track. 

The bizarre assault remained largely unresolved until it took a tragic turn years later when, in September 1994, one of Rather's attackers later fatally shot and killed an NBC stagehand who was working alone outside a television studio in New York. The attacker was attempting to force himself into the NBC building to, again, attempt to learn a network's "brainwashing" frequency so he could stop it. After seeing a photo of the assailant, Rather was able to confirm that the 1994 murderer was one of his attackers. 

Working Alone Presents Safety Concerns 

Rather was assaulted and the NBC employee murdered because of their occupation, and in the case of the NBC stagehand, his isolation in an unsecured location outside of his workplace led to his death. Unfortunately, these attacks are not isolated examples of violence on individuals performing their job while working alone. Employees who work alone, including those who provide services outside or at remote or unsecured customer sites are attacked or murdered on a regular basis. 

The Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) claims that nearly 2 million employees are victims of workplace violence each year and, on average, over 400 workers are murdered at work. Although any employee can be the victim of workplace violence, OSHA identifies the following workers as at high risk of workplace violence: those working at night, alone or small groups, delivery workers, and others who have high contact with the public. 

Given the recent increase in this type of workplace violence, employers should take proactive steps to protect employees from such incidents. Employers can glean valuable lessons from the What's-The-Frequency-Kenneth attacks to learn how to take additional precautions to protect employees who work alone, like the following:

Conclusion 

The Rather and NBC attacks were tragic events. The notoriety they gained through the R.E.M. hit, however, gives us a constant reminder of the violence that can occur when employees are defenseless and alone. Although no perfect response to the recent increase in workplace violence is currently available, you should begin taking steps to avoid violent situations and minimize the risk to your employees. 

Rather (no pun intended) than take a reactive approach to workplace violence, you should consider acting proactively in an effort to avoid these incidents. We recommend implementing a pre-mortem analysis of "what could go wrong" instead of waiting for a "what-went-wrong" review after the fact.  After all, we want everyone to go home Shiny Happy People.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors