Never miss a great news story!
Get instant notifications from Economic Times
AllowNot now


You can switch off notifications anytime using browser settings.

Portfolio

Loading...
Select Portfolio and Asset Combination for Display on Market Band
Select Portfolio
Select Asset Class
Show More
Download ET MARKETS APP

Get ET Markets in your own language

DOWNLOAD THE APP NOW

+91

CHOOSE LANGUAGE

ENG

  • ENG - English
  • HIN - हिन्दी
  • GUJ - ગુજરાતી
  • MAR - मराठी
  • BEN - বাংলা
  • KAN - ಕನ್ನಡ
  • ORI - ଓଡିଆ
  • TEL - తెలుగు
  • TAM - தமிழ்
Drag according to your convenience
ET NOW RADIO
ET NOW
TIMES NOW

What does a ‘Misleading’ ad mean? Industry wants government to spell it out

Updated: Jan 08, 2018, 08.26 AM IST
0Comments
advertisement
Celebrities endorsing misleading ads will have to pay penalty of up to Rs 50 lakh and serve a ban of up to three years once the Consumer Protection Bill 2018.
NEW DELHI: The advertising and talent management industry says it will seek clarification from the government on what is 'misleading', a day after the consumer affairs minister proposed a new consumer protection bill stating that celebrities face up to a three-year ban for appearing in misleading ads.

"We will seek clarification on this. While clamping down on misleading ads is good, how do we do detailed due diligence on the brands we associate with? Do we visit each of their plants, labs, test all their ingredient claims? If there's a misleading claim by the brand, it's the brand that needs to be questioned," said Arun Pandey, managing director at Rhiti Sports, which exclusively represents MS Dhoni, former cricket captain and among the country's top 10 highest paid celebrities.

Stating that the celebrity gets endorsement deals because of his or her credentials, Pandey cited the example of realty firm Amrapali. In mid-2016, Dhoni quit as brand ambassador of Amrapali after he was trolled extensively by dissatisfied buyers for delays in the completion of a housing project by the company.

Two years back, FIRs had been lodged by state-level courts against A-listers Amitabh Bachchan and Madhuri Dixit for endorsing Maggi noodles, soon after it was banned by food regulator Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. "Every endorsement includes a clause where the brand guarantees that they are not making false claims — this is legally binding," said Anirban Das Blah, managing director of leading talent management and content development firm Kwan Entertainment, representing Deepika Padukone and Ranbir Kapoor among close to hundred other names.

"How does one define what is misleading? How will the celebrity have all the resources to verify all claims of brands they endorse? In the absence of clearly defined guidelines, these will be impossible to implement," Blah, who recently inked a joint venture with brand management and licensing agency Dream Theatre, said.

Celebrities endorsing misleading ads will have to pay penalty of up to Rs 50 lakh and serve a ban of up to three years once the Consumer Protection Bill 2018, placed in the Lok Sabha on Friday by Minister of Food and Consumer Affairs Ram Vilas Paswan, is cleared by Parliament.

Prathap Suthan, managing partner of Bang in the Middle, who works with multiple celebrities said that the bill is "slightly off colour".
1 a
2 a






0Comments

Also Read

No plans to revamp NPPA: Government

E-governance is stepping stone for good governance: UIDAI chief

British government set for Monday reshuffle

Big questions confront the government in 2018

Government in favour of separate regulator for CAs

Comments
Add Your Comments

Loading
Please wait...