'The world will be watching what you do', US warns Iran at UN

Press Trust of India  |  United Nations 

"The world will be watching what you do," to the UN has warned during an emergency meeting of the to discuss the situation in the Islamic nation which has faced a series of nationwide anti-protests.

Durting the meeting, three members France, and of the permanent five, joined in asserting that this 15-membered body was not an appropriate forum to discuss the current situation in as it does not pose any threat to international peace and security.


Heated debate took place on the floor of the Security Council at the in after its 15 members were gathered at the request of the US to discuss the current situation in

"The people of are rising up. They are asking for something that no can legitimately deny them: their human rights and fundamental freedoms. They are calling out, Think of us. If the founding principles of this institution mean anything, we will not only hear their cry, we will finally answer it. The Iranian regime is now on notice. The world will be watching what you do," told a meeting of the

The meeting of the was convened at the request of the US to discuss the current situation in Iran, where some 21 people have lost their lives in more than week-long anti-protests across the country.

US has come out in support of the protestors.

Every UN member state is sovereign, but member states cannot use sovereignty as a shield when they categorically deny their people human rights and fundamental freedoms, said.

She called on all of her other colleagues in the Security Council to join her in amplifying the message of the Iranian people.

"And I call on the of to stop censoring the voice of the people and to restore the access to the internet. Because in the end, the Iranian people will determine their own destiny," she said.

"And let there be no doubt whatsoever: The US stands unapologetically with those in who seek freedom for themselves, prosperity for their families, and dignity for their nation. We will not be quiet. No dishonest attempt to call the protestors, puppets of foreign powers, will change that. The Iranian people know the truth. And we know the truth," said.

Briefing the Security Council, Taye-Brook Zerihoun, UN Secretary-General for Political Affairs, said the demonstrations taking place in were a fundamental expression of human rights, and a powerful exhibition of brave people who were so fed up with their oppressive regime that they were willing to risk their lives in protest.

The Iranian regime's contempt of the rights of its people had been widely documented, she said.

Addressing the Security Council, the Iranian to the UN, Gholamali Khoshoroo slammed the 15-membered body to have allowed itself to be abused by the in holding a meeting that falls outside the scope of its mandate.

This is a mistake by the Security Council, he said.

"This is nothing but another desperate attempt by the US administration to escape, as it has lost every shred of moral, political and legal authority and credibility in the eyes of the whole world," he said.

There is a long history of US bullying at the UN, and the case of the Iranian protest was a preposterous example of interference in the purely internal affairs of a nation.

Khoshoroo alleged that the US has a long history of intervening in the internal affairs of Iran, including a continuous pattern of disruption in the democratisation process in

British to the UN, Matthew Rycroft, refuted the Iranian allegations and said that no one is forcing onto their agenda.

"The is perfectly empowered through Article 34 of the UN Charter, and I quote, to investigate any dispute or any situation which might lead to international friction or give rise to a dispute in order to determine whether the continuance of the dispute or situation is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security," he said.

However, the Russian agreed with and said US is abusing the platform of the

should be allowed to deal with its own problems, he said asserting that the Council should not be involved in destabilising

"Following the current logic, it should have held a meeting after the events in Ferguson, History is full of attempts to replace undesirable regimes, but people preferred not to remember that. The real reason to convene the meeting is a veiled attempt to use the current moment to undermine the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action," he said.

Observing that the Council's primary responsibility is maintaining international peace and security, Wu Haito of said that it should not be the venue for discussing the human rights situation of any country.

"The Iranian situation did not pose a threat to international peace and security, and discussing its domestic situation is not part of the Council's responsibilities as outlined in the Charter," he said.

Joining Iran, and China, the French to the UN, it is up to the Iranians alone to pursue the path of peace.

"However worrying the recent events were, they did not constitute a threat to international peace and security. Change in would not come from the outside, it would come from the Iranian people themselves," he added.

Among the non-permanent members, representatives from Bolivia, Equatorial Guinea, sided with the Iranian argument that the Council was not the forum to discuss the current situation in

The meeting was chaired by Kairat Umarov, the of to the UN. Speaking in his national capacity, he said his country considered the developments in to be a domestic issue that did not fall under the mandate of the

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Sat, January 06 2018. 07:40 IST