Pained by undertrials languishing in jail despite bail: HC

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The High has said it is "pained" by undertrials languishing in Jail despite getting as they could not furnish a bond or surety due to poverty and issued a slew of directions to be followed by trial courts to ensure that such people get relief.

A bench of Acting and Justice C said several Supreme verdicts have held that fundamental rights of even a prisoner accused of serious offences cannot be overlooked under any circumstance.


The high further said that even the Commission had recommended that risk assessments be carried out of undertrial prisoners, who languish in jail as they cannot fulfil conditions, so that they can be released.

The directions of the came on a PIL filed by Verma who contended that hundreds of people were languishing in Jail here, despite grant of

"We are extremely pained that despite clear laid down on the subject by the Supreme as well as clear statutory provisions and Commission recommendations, 253 undertrial prisoners are still languishing in Jail despite grant of which has necessitated this order," the bench said.

The high in its order directed the trial courts to be more sensitive and vigilant about such cases and to undertake a review of the reasons as to why an undertrial could not be released on

The bench said the trial can then carry out a risk assessment of the undertrial and thereafter, modify the conditions, if required.

It directed the judges of each district who visit the Jail to ensure a list of undertrials who have been granted but could not be released is brought to the notice of the concerned.

The district judges have been also directed to submit a report of the risk assessments carried out by the trial courts apart from verifying the list of 253 undertrials given by the government and to review any other pending cases of prisoners who could not secure release despite grant of

The list of 253 undertrials was placed before the bench by government

The jail authorities were also directed by the high to promptly bring such cases to the attention of the trial courts and the State (DSLSA).

The bench listed the matter on January 31, 2018 for filing the reports indicating compliance of its directions.

The PIL blamed the lower courts for not exercising the option of personal bond for financially unstable prisoners and said it was misuse of discretionary powers by the judicial system.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Sun, December 17 2017. 10:05 IST