7
Jaguar’s second SUV faces up to the Audi Q3, BMW X1 and Mercedes-Benz GLA. Tough task, so is the E-Pace up to it?
Matt Prior
19 November 2017

What is it?

This is the first transverse-engined, front-driven Jaguar since the X-Type. Only quite a lot seems to have happened since that car.

Back then, it was a saloon designed with more than a gentle nod to the past.

Today, the E-Pace arrives looking every bit as fresh as the rest of the Jaguar range and sits squarely in an ever-growing market.

This whole SUV thing doesn’t look like ending, either. Around half a decade ago, Jaguar was selling 60,000 cars a year. Now it reaches that figure with the F-Pace alone.

The E-Pace sits below the F-Pace, then, as the XE sits below the XF, so although ‘E’ implies electric in most other people’s ranges, it ain’t here. So, here we are: a compact SUV is a departure for Jaguar, but man cannot live on elegant saloons and sports cars alone. And so we get a natural, Callum-lite design touch applied to a 4.4m-long SUV.

Which looks? Well, you decide. I think if you grabbed each wheel and pulled it outwards a bit, you’d have a rather elegant car. Place a hand over the lower half of it in pictures and the roofline is as graceful and flowing as you’d hope. But, down to its compact length and 1.65m height, it looks like a stress-ball version of an F-Pace. F-Pace in caricature.

The architecture is interesting. The E-Pace is based on the Land Rover Discovery Sport and Range Rover Evoque’s platform, but there are key differences. From a practical consideration, it won’t be built at Halewood, Merseyside, because those plants are at capacity.

This one, then, will be built by Magna in Austria plus, later, by Jaguar Land Rover in China.

But there’s more of significance than that. This mostly steel monocoque, with a transverse front engine, is designed for mostly front-drive cars, rather than rear-drive cars like Jaguars of old. Our test car is four-wheel drive, but front-drivers will be available at launch, too.

There are, still, key differences from an Evoque. The front suspension subframe is rigidly mounted – at least, in places – to the chassis, to improve steering precision. At the back, there is Jaguar’s integral link set-up.

But making a car with this kind of ground clearance and body height, and with a mostly steel monocoque, means the resulting car is heavy, despite the use of some light materials. At 1894kg in this trim, the E-Pace is more than 100kg heavier than an equivalently engined, 1770kg F-Pace.

Engineers will work to accomplish remarkable feats, though. But by gum, we’re asking them to here, aren’t we? Create a tall Jaguar but make it behave like an XE, please. The constant goals are to make cars faster, more efficient and more comfortable, and then we throw at car makers the challenges of making them taller and having a larger frontal area, too.

On the inside, then, what do you get? A car that feels like a Jaguar, no question. The E-Pace’s interior follows a theme first set out by the F-Type, where the driver and passenger areas have a clear demarcation.

On the left is an open, swooping dashboard section, shaped like the kind of cascading waterfall feature you’d find in the lobby of a posh office, while the section on the right is more driver-focused and there’s a big grab handle between the two.

You can imagine seeing this design on a piece of paper and thinking ‘wow, that looks terrific’, and it looks pretty good in reality, too.

Some of the plastics don’t necessarily look as solid as in something out of Germany, and you get some glare out of the big metallic plastic gearlever surround. But if you’re asking whether it feels premium, it does. Absolutely.

As well it’ll have to, given that the minimum price is £28,000 and this HSE version is £48,410. If you wanted R-Dynamic design highlights, that would become £50,710.

Why’s that? Because it has the 296bhp Ingenium petrol engine, which is the top mechanical spec.

It, like all E-Pace engines, is a 2.0-litre four-pot. There are diesels of 148bhp, 178bhp and 237bhp, and petrols of 246bhp and 296bhp, all variously mated to six-speed manual, or automatic transmissions. Some are front drive, others four-wheel drive.

Here the P300-designated motor is mated to a nine-speed ZF auto gearbox, which was designed specifically for transverse engine applications, and it drives all four wheels in this instance.

There are two types of four-wheel-drive system in the E-Pace. One is the Haldex system that’s all but the same as you’ll find in an Evoque. It drives the fronts in normal conditions but can put up to 100% to the rear if there’s loads of slip.

The other – reserved for the highest-powered petrol and diesel models – is a GKN system that you’ll also find on, of all things, a Ford Focus RS.

It’s much cleverer, much more able to push torque where it wants to at the rear, because it has a clutch either side of the rear differential that can distribute power left and right. The intention is to make the E-Pace feel more rear-driven.

In the RS, up to 70% of torque can go to the rear axle, but in the Jaguar, for reasons as yet unknown (we’ve asked), only a maximum of 50% shuffles to the rear. Adaptive dampers will come later, complete with 21in wheels.

Meantime, although I’d like to know what an E-Pace is like with a £15k-£20k-lower price, we’ll have to make do with this all-singing, all-dancing 20in-alloy-wheeled version that, until adaptive dampers arrive, is the most dynamic an E-Pace will likely feel. 

What's it like?

You get in, try to get comfortable, and succeed rather easily.

There’s decent storage space, acceptable space in the back and a 577-litre boot, incidentally. The steering wheel adjusts in sizeable fashion and, at around 2.5 turns lock to lock, it moves with trademark Jaguar smoothness.

On step-off, the smoothness you get from ZF’s eight-speed rear-drive auto isn’t quite matched by this nine-speeder.

It feels more like, although isn’t, a dual-clutch auto. There’s less of the natural creep as you lift off the brake. Throw in a ride that is a little bit brittle on 20in alloy wheels – because these are big wheels on a car this size – and on the 50-metre test, that first crucial drive where impressions flood to you, and where a Jaguar is usually soothing and makes you think ‘hello, old friend’, here it’s a bit more ‘who are you?’.

Then you get rolling and the ride improves, but what you’re facing is, I think, the constant compromise that a tall car like this asks. Do what you will, and Jaguar does it better than most, but you’re always fighting the difficulties of making a tall, dynamic car.

You increase the height, which means you increase the roll centre and centre of gravity, and the car’s propensity to lean in corners. So you stiffen the anti-roll bars, and that’s fine because it reduces the lean, but it also affects the ride.

Which you could relieve in two ways – fit adaptive dampers, which, as mentioned, are coming later to the E-Pace range, or an active anti-roll bar, which isn’t – but anything you do fit adds weight to a car you’ve intrinsically made heavier in the first place by making it tall.

But a Jaguar has to be nice to drive because that’s one of two main reasons you’d buy one: because they’re the best-looking cars in their class and the most pleasing to drive. Yet this is a class not noted for its dynamic capability.

As far as the compromise goes, then, I think Jaguar has got it about as good as it realistically can. I don’t want to sound like I’m damning it with faint praise, here, but this is a 1.65m-tall, 4.4m-long car and they wanted it to drive like an XE. That’s asking a lot.

Too much, actually, although driving it is pleasing enough. It does have a character of its own, with trademark Jaguar steering feel and, if not a traditional Jaguar ride quality, given the nature of the control it has over its body movements – and that is impressive – a ride that’s as good as you can expect.

In cornering, the E-Pace more than hangs on gamely, too. It pushes into understeer eventually, but it resists it well, and the rear becomes involved in hard cornering, as well it might with that Focus RS-ish torque shuffle, although here it manifests itself in a kind of diagonal pitch.

Is it enjoyable in a way that even a bog-standard rear-drive XE saloon is? Not a bit of it. As much fun as, say, a front-drive Ford Fiesta? Not especially. But is it good, and capable? Absolutely. In fact, in terms of capability – given the height, the visibility, the body control, the grip, the traction and the shove – this is probably a very quick car between two places.

The engine is restrained enough most of the time, with some not unpleasant blare at higher revs.

But as with all cars of this type, it is for looking at, rather than listening to. And people do look at it: they point, they stare, they photograph, they talk to you about it, and there is obviously tremendous goodwill towards it and the brand.

That is the appeal of a compact, sometimes-affordable SUV. This car is making a style statement in a way that the Volkswagen Group’s equivalent cars simply do not, even when – as with, say, the VW T-Roc – they have a go. Slice an E-Pace along its flank and its top half is unmistakably a modern Jaguar design. Do the same with a VW Group SUV and it could be an ‘any one from the VW Group’ SUV. 

Should I buy one?

After a day’s driving the E-Pace, I climbed back into a Skoda Superb estate, which had four-wheel drive, a 276bhp petrol engine and a terrific auto gearbox. It rode better, steered nicely, was vast and felt pretty much as nice inside yet cost less than £36,000.

So although I’m sure there’s a four-star car in this E-Pace, I can only test the version in front of me and, at nearly £50,000, if I recommended you should buy one, you’d suggest part of its price would make its way into my bank account.

So, for now, 3.5 stars it is. It’s a good car, though. Not one you’d pick if you prioritised dynamics, but then you probably knew that anyway.

Jaguar E-Pace P300 HSE AWD Auto

Where Brighton On sale Now Price £48,410 Engine 4cyls, 1998cc, turbocharged petrol Power 296bhp at 5500rpm Torque 295lb ft at 1500rpm Gearbox 9-spd automatic Kerbweight 1894kg Top speed 151mph 0-62mph 6.4sec Fuel economy 35.5mpg CO2/BIK 181g/km, 35% Rivals Audi Q3, BMW X1, Mercedes-Benz GLA

Join the debate

Comments
46

19 November 2017

1894kg?!!!

A34

19 November 2017

Theory 1: JLR have lost their nose and can’t smell the anti diesel coffee coming from the kitchen. So they think the petrol versions are premium versions. Versus the Germans offering competitive 1.5 petrols...

Theory 2: this made of steel, in Austria. If Brexit gets squiffy, they can flog these to the Europeans, or if really squiffy and the New German Empire closes its borders to the UK, they can move the factory to China, blame the EU, and work on what they really need: a small aluminium chassis E-Pace (/Disco Sport /Ewok)...

Either way I hope they made it reliable! Autocar should knock off 1.5 stars just for dismal ratings there...

19 November 2017

Agree, A34 - it's overpriced. Very much like XE, too many extras to pay for.

19 November 2017

most are over 2 tonnes- especially the diesels.

And £50k is just greedy or ridiculous. Or both

19 November 2017

' As far as the compromise goes, then, I think Jaguar has got it about as good as it realistically can.'

What a load of rubbish.

Jaguar can take many other steps to improve the car's handling.

19 November 2017

Holly cow, nearly 50 grand for an X1 rival?!

20 November 2017
Overdrive wrote:

Holly cow, nearly 50 grand for an X1 rival?!

 

its probably more a BMW X2 rival. That will easily reach 50k with a 300 bhp engine.

19 November 2017

Odd.

Especially that bit that sticks out of the dash to the left of the gear selector, wtf is that all about? The passenger will love that - not.

And why is the touchscreen angled upwards where it has more chance of picking up reflections. And why do they still produce that ridiculous looking mis-centred steering wheel.

Because 'Jaguar', that's why.

19 November 2017

Come on Matt, it's nearly 2018!  3 paragraphs on how various bits of subframe are mounted but nothing on how the navigation, music, traffic info etc works!  I love driving but realistically I spend 90% of my time in traffic trying to work out the least congested route to get where I'm going and want some connected music whilst doing it!

 

 

 

19 November 2017

but I've always thought the F-Pace looks slightly oversized - the E-Pace looks great.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Jaguar E-Pace P300
    First Drive
    19 November 2017
    Jaguar’s second SUV faces up to the Audi Q3, BMW X1 and Mercedes-Benz GLA. Tough task, so is the E-Pace up to it?
  • Jaguar E-Pace D180
    First Drive
    19 November 2017
    Not the driver’s car many would hope from any car wearing the Jaguar badge, but the E-Pace is an attractive and interesting addition to the compact premium SUV ranks
  • Subaru Impreza
    First Drive
    17 November 2017
    The fifth-generation Subaru Impreza is much improved from top to bottom, but a poor engine and gearbox keep it trailing in this competitive class
  • Ford Fiesta Vignale
    First Drive
    17 November 2017
    We get a first taste of Ford’s poshest Fiesta in turbocharged diesel form
  • Seat Arona
    Car review
    17 November 2017
    Seat is on a roll but can the Arona, its new junior SUV, cut it in such an ultra-competitive class?