Never miss a great news story!
Get instant notifications from Economic Times
AllowNot now


You can switch off notifications anytime using browser settings.

Portfolio

Loading...
Select Portfolio and Asset Combination for Display on Market Band
Select Portfolio
Select Asset Class
Show More
Download ET MARKETS APP

Get ET Markets in your own language

DOWNLOAD THE APP NOW

+91

CHOOSE LANGUAGE

ENG

  • ENG - English
  • HIN - हिन्दी
  • GUJ - ગુજરાતી
  • MAR - मराठी
  • BEN - বাংলা
  • KAN - ಕನ್ನಡ
  • ORI - ଓଡିଆ
  • TEL - తెలుగు
  • TAM - தமிழ்
Drag according to your convenience
ET NOW RADIO
ET NOW
TIMES NOW

LG must be told of decisions, but he can’t stall work: Supreme Court

, ET Bureau|
Updated: Nov 08, 2017, 01.59 AM IST
0Comments
Concurrence is not a must except in areas which are delineated for the central government, a five-judge bench led by CJI Dipak Misra said.
Concurrence is not a must except in areas which are delineated for the central government, a five-judge bench led by CJI Dipak Misra said.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that the Delhi government must communicate all decisions taken to the LG but he cannot hold up governance on the ground that he does not concur with these decisions. Concurrence is not a must except in areas which are delineated for the central government, a five-judge bench led by CJI Dipak Misra said.

Today was the second day of arguments by the Delhi government on the bitter row between the state government and the Centre over powers to govern Delhi, which culminated with the AAP government moving the High Court.

The High Court ruled against the Delhi government, prompting it to come in appeal to the top court. In its remarks, the top court has clearly given a warning to both sides to back off and make the existing legislative scheme work.

The court has said that though the power balance in the scheme of things seemed tilted in the LG’s favour, governance cannot be made a casualty.

“… it shall be the duty and obligation of the CM and his Council of Ministers to communicate all decisions to the LG though every such decision might not warrant his concurrence…,” the court observed.

The court remarks came during arguments by senior advocate Gopal Subramanium who argued that though the LG was supposed to be bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers he seemed to have assumed overriding powers.

“… once the government takes a decision it is duty-bound to communicate the decision to the LG. This is the working envisaged by Parliament. This can’t be construed as interference, though every decision might not warrant concurrence,” the CJI remarked. “You can take executive action in areas where you have legislative powers.”
0Comments

Also Read

LG, Qualcomm join hands for autonomous driving

Supreme Court says power with LG, but may bring rider

LG Electronics partners with Paytm Mall

LG to bring premium 'LG Signature' brand to India in July

LG joins hands with Bajaj Finance to offer products at no cost EMI

Comments
Add Your Comments

Loading
Please wait...