Faulty airbags: Forum orders car companies to replace vehicle
TNN | Updated: Oct 4, 2017, 14:48 IST
PANAJI: The North Goa Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum has ordered a manufacturer to replace a consumer's Swift ZDI BS IV with a brand new equivalent car and pay Rs 2 lakh as compensation for selling the vehicle with faulty airbag system that didn't inflate during a collision.
In a case of proven negligence, the district consumer forum termed the conduct of the opposite parties in refusing to accept the manufacturing defect of the airbags of the car 'unacceptable'.
The complaint was filed against Sai Service and Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
"The opposite parties have played with human life by selling a car with defective airbags. Looking at the accident from the photographs, we conclude the complainants are lucky to have miraculously survived the severe collision without the safety of the frontal airbags," states the order that was passed by forum president S Vales and members Varsha Bale and Auroliano de Oliveira.
The car, purchased by Rajeshri Nair in 2012, met with an accident on May 1, 2015, in Davngiri taluka, near Bengaluru, Karnataka. The airbag system of the car malfunctioned and didn't inflate resulting in Nair's husband, Ajoshmon R, in the passenger seat injuring his forehead.
He managed to save his life only because was wearing a seat belt at the time and he had tilted his seat slightly, keeping his head bent towards the gear side.
The forum stated that both the opposite parties are liable for selling the car with a manufacturing defect with the airbags where they didn't make any attempt to successfully resolve the issue and instead 'went in denial mode'.
If they do not replace the car, the opposite parties are directed to refund to the complainant a sum of Rs 5,00,000, as claimed by the complainants.
In a case of proven negligence, the district consumer forum termed the conduct of the opposite parties in refusing to accept the manufacturing defect of the airbags of the car 'unacceptable'.
The complaint was filed against Sai Service and Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
"The opposite parties have played with human life by selling a car with defective airbags. Looking at the accident from the photographs, we conclude the complainants are lucky to have miraculously survived the severe collision without the safety of the frontal airbags," states the order that was passed by forum president S Vales and members Varsha Bale and Auroliano de Oliveira.
The car, purchased by Rajeshri Nair in 2012, met with an accident on May 1, 2015, in Davngiri taluka, near Bengaluru, Karnataka. The airbag system of the car malfunctioned and didn't inflate resulting in Nair's husband, Ajoshmon R, in the passenger seat injuring his forehead.
He managed to save his life only because was wearing a seat belt at the time and he had tilted his seat slightly, keeping his head bent towards the gear side.
The forum stated that both the opposite parties are liable for selling the car with a manufacturing defect with the airbags where they didn't make any attempt to successfully resolve the issue and instead 'went in denial mode'.
If they do not replace the car, the opposite parties are directed to refund to the complainant a sum of Rs 5,00,000, as claimed by the complainants.
Get latest news & live updates on the go on your pc with News App. Download The Times of India news app for your device.
From around the web
More from The Times of India
From the Web
More From The Times of India
10 Indian Divas Who Never Got Married
CRITICSUNION6 M.O Baby needs urgent ventilator support
MilaapTop 13 vacation destinations in the U.S.A
Viral Vacation IdeasAn Indian dietitian who understands you & will help you!
Online Indian NutritionistsImprove Your Vigor,Vitality & Stamina.Govt Approved.36% Off
ZEEAYURVEDA
All Comments ()+^ Back to Top
Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive. Let's work together to keep the conversation civil.
HIDE