Protest over judge transfer affects courts in Karnataka
TNN | Oct 5, 2017, 03:40 IST
BENGALURU: Proceedings in courts across Karnataka, including the high court, were affected on Wednesday as advocates stayed away in protest against the proposed transfer and consequent resignation of Justice Jayant Patel from the high court.
Justice Patel, the secondmost senior judge of the Karnataka HC, had resigned on September 27, saying he wasn't keen on a transfer with barely 10 months of his tenure left. He declined to react to his proposed transfer to the Allahabad high court. He was transferred to Karnataka in February 2016 after he was the acting chief justice of the Gujarat high court for about six months.
Considering his seniority, Justice Patel was supposed be the acting chief justice of the Karnataka high court after Justice S K Mukherjee's retirement on October 9.
The Karnataka State Bar Council (KSBC) had, on September 27, passed a resolution asking advocates to abstain from courts following the sudden resignation of Justice Patel.
The Advocates Association of Bengaluru supported the call. Most courts, barring those dealing with criminal matters, ended early as advocates stayed away.
In some instances in the HC, litigants were seen pleading with the judges to post their matter for the earliest working day, saying they had been waiting for months or even years. Only two cases, in which the parties themselves submitted their arguments, were taken up for consideration in the HC.
In criminal cases, pending criminal petitions and criminal appeals were heard as the prosecution presented their case. A similar situation prevailed in subordinate courts, tribunals and revenue courts as well.
Justice Patel, the secondmost senior judge of the Karnataka HC, had resigned on September 27, saying he wasn't keen on a transfer with barely 10 months of his tenure left. He declined to react to his proposed transfer to the Allahabad high court. He was transferred to Karnataka in February 2016 after he was the acting chief justice of the Gujarat high court for about six months.
Considering his seniority, Justice Patel was supposed be the acting chief justice of the Karnataka high court after Justice S K Mukherjee's retirement on October 9.
The Karnataka State Bar Council (KSBC) had, on September 27, passed a resolution asking advocates to abstain from courts following the sudden resignation of Justice Patel.
The Advocates Association of Bengaluru supported the call. Most courts, barring those dealing with criminal matters, ended early as advocates stayed away.
In some instances in the HC, litigants were seen pleading with the judges to post their matter for the earliest working day, saying they had been waiting for months or even years. Only two cases, in which the parties themselves submitted their arguments, were taken up for consideration in the HC.
In criminal cases, pending criminal petitions and criminal appeals were heard as the prosecution presented their case. A similar situation prevailed in subordinate courts, tribunals and revenue courts as well.
Get latest news & live updates on the go on your pc with News App. Download The Times of India news app for your device.
From around the web
More from The Times of India
From the Web
More From The Times of India
The secret NRIs are using to grow their wealth...
SmartOwnerProtect your cherished possessions
STATE FARM INSURANCEबुलेट ट्रेन प्रोजेक्ट से मिलेंगी 24 हजार नई नौकरियां
NETWORK18 MEDIA & INVESTMENTS LTDThese actors have unbelievable bank balances.
Fropky.comCEO Reveals “Huge $20 Bitcoin Opportunity” (Watch)
Agora Financial Guide Subscription
All Comments ()+^ Back to Top
Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive. Let's work together to keep the conversation civil.
HIDE