Name schools that didn’t respond to safety directives: HC
Vaibhav Ganjapure | TNN | Oct 5, 2017, 03:31 IST
Nagpur: Upset over schools' failure to reply to its repeated directives, the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court on Wednesday asked amicus curiae to prepare a detailed chart of all such schools so that it could take appropriate action on them.
A bench of Justices Bhushan Dharmadhikari and Swapna Joshi directed Firdos Mirza to complete formalities before November 8, the next date of hearing after Diwali vacations.
The court's was hearing a suo motu PIL on death of nine-year-old Virat Zade, a student of Central India Public School, on January 9, 2011. He was crushed under the school bus in Hudkeshwar while returning from school. He went under the bus to collect his tiffin box that had fallen while disembarking from the vehicle. The incident created a huge uproar among citizens.
During last hearing, the court had slapped Rs5,000 fine on 126 schools after Mirza pointed out that all of them plied buses to ferry the students but had failed to secure fitness certificates of those vehicles, thus putting several lives under risk. It also came to fore that despite issuing notices to all 126 schools, only Virat's school had responded so far.
Mirza added that out of 25,369 school buses in Maharashtra, only 13,440 had undergone fitness test of RTO as per court's orders. Over 12,000 buses were plying, including in city, without such certificates. The schools were told to constitute 'school bus committees' that again had not been complied with.
The amicus also pointed out that director of education had issued a circular asking the school bus owners to have CCTV cameras and women conductors and also carry out police verification of drivers and conductors. But hardly any school complied with the directives. On Wednesday, a few schools deposited their fines with the court registry through their counsels but most failed to respond.
A bench of Justices Bhushan Dharmadhikari and Swapna Joshi directed Firdos Mirza to complete formalities before November 8, the next date of hearing after Diwali vacations.
The court's was hearing a suo motu PIL on death of nine-year-old Virat Zade, a student of Central India Public School, on January 9, 2011. He was crushed under the school bus in Hudkeshwar while returning from school. He went under the bus to collect his tiffin box that had fallen while disembarking from the vehicle. The incident created a huge uproar among citizens.
During last hearing, the court had slapped Rs5,000 fine on 126 schools after Mirza pointed out that all of them plied buses to ferry the students but had failed to secure fitness certificates of those vehicles, thus putting several lives under risk. It also came to fore that despite issuing notices to all 126 schools, only Virat's school had responded so far.
Mirza added that out of 25,369 school buses in Maharashtra, only 13,440 had undergone fitness test of RTO as per court's orders. Over 12,000 buses were plying, including in city, without such certificates. The schools were told to constitute 'school bus committees' that again had not been complied with.
The amicus also pointed out that director of education had issued a circular asking the school bus owners to have CCTV cameras and women conductors and also carry out police verification of drivers and conductors. But hardly any school complied with the directives. On Wednesday, a few schools deposited their fines with the court registry through their counsels but most failed to respond.
Get latest news & live updates on the go on your pc with News App. Download The Times of India news app for your device.
From around the web
More from The Times of India
From the Web
More From The Times of India
These actors have unbelievable bank balances.
Fropky.comThe 2017 Lincoln Navigator Is Sure To Impress.
Yahoo SearchSelf-Made Millionaire's Stock Market “Master Pattern”
Money MorningGet Your Smile Back! Look For New Dental Implant Solutions..
Dental Implants | Search LinksSay Goodbye To Itchy & Cracked Feet Forever
Dermalmedix
All Comments ()+^ Back to Top
Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive. Let's work together to keep the conversation civil.
HIDE