States must compensate victims of cow vigilantes: Supreme Court
TNN | Sep 23, 2017, 01:59 ISTHighlights
- SC said that states were obliged to compensate victims of violence perpetrated by cow vigilantes
- The court was firm in its view that “law and order has to receive primacy

NEW DELHI: A fortnight after directing states to take stern action to stop cow vigilante groups from becoming law unto themselves, the Supreme Court said on Friday that states were obliged to compensate victims of violence perpetrated by these criminal gangs.
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud said, "Victims of violence have to be compensated. States are obliged to frame victim compensation schemes and grant assistance to victims of violence."
Seizing the opportunity, senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for petitioner Tushar Gandhi, said no compensation was given to cow vigilantism victim Junaid of Faridabad till date and requested the court to order the Haryana government to take urgent steps in this regard. "Not only in Haryana, but in many other instances in other states, no compensation has been paid to victims of cow vigilantism," she said.
The bench refused to be drawn into specific instances of violence by cow vigilante groups while dealing with the larger issue. "On the Faridabad incident, you must approach the high court concerned. We do not want to mix this incident with the real issue you (petitioner) are espousing," it said.
Jaising pleaded it was high time the SC stepped in to frame a national policy against cow vigilantism to prevent violence in the name of cow protection. "Please direct the Centre to come out with a scheme for prevention of such violence," she said.
The bench said there was a practical difficulty in asking for a national policy on what was primarily a law-and-order issue, falling squarely in the domain of states. "We do not want to pass such an order. It is a state subject. It is constitutionally not permissible to order the Centre to frame a national policy," the CJI-headed bench said.
However, the court was firm in its view that "law and order has to receive primacy and anyone violating peace must face stringent action". The court noted that only Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Jharkhand and Karnataka had filed affidavits to inform the court about complying with its September 6 order. It asked the other states to file their compliance affidavits by October 13.
On September 6, the SC had ordered states to take immediate steps to rein in cow vigilante groups and prevent these gangs from "taking the law into their hands" and keep highways safe from such attacks. It had directed states to appoint a senior police officer for each district as the nodal person to coordinate action against cow vigilante groups. It had ordered chief secretaries of each state to meet the directors general of police to keep highways safe.
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud said, "Victims of violence have to be compensated. States are obliged to frame victim compensation schemes and grant assistance to victims of violence."
Seizing the opportunity, senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for petitioner Tushar Gandhi, said no compensation was given to cow vigilantism victim Junaid of Faridabad till date and requested the court to order the Haryana government to take urgent steps in this regard. "Not only in Haryana, but in many other instances in other states, no compensation has been paid to victims of cow vigilantism," she said.
The bench refused to be drawn into specific instances of violence by cow vigilante groups while dealing with the larger issue. "On the Faridabad incident, you must approach the high court concerned. We do not want to mix this incident with the real issue you (petitioner) are espousing," it said.
Jaising pleaded it was high time the SC stepped in to frame a national policy against cow vigilantism to prevent violence in the name of cow protection. "Please direct the Centre to come out with a scheme for prevention of such violence," she said.
The bench said there was a practical difficulty in asking for a national policy on what was primarily a law-and-order issue, falling squarely in the domain of states. "We do not want to pass such an order. It is a state subject. It is constitutionally not permissible to order the Centre to frame a national policy," the CJI-headed bench said.
However, the court was firm in its view that "law and order has to receive primacy and anyone violating peace must face stringent action". The court noted that only Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Jharkhand and Karnataka had filed affidavits to inform the court about complying with its September 6 order. It asked the other states to file their compliance affidavits by October 13.
On September 6, the SC had ordered states to take immediate steps to rein in cow vigilante groups and prevent these gangs from "taking the law into their hands" and keep highways safe from such attacks. It had directed states to appoint a senior police officer for each district as the nodal person to coordinate action against cow vigilante groups. It had ordered chief secretaries of each state to meet the directors general of police to keep highways safe.
Get latest news & live updates on the go on your pc with News App. Download The Times of India news app for your device.
From around the web
More from The Times of India
From the Web
More From The Times of India
- Protect your cherished possessionsSTATE FARM INSURANCE
- बुलेट ट्रेन प्रोजेक्ट से मिलेंगी 24 हजार नई नौकरियांNETWORK18 MEDIA & INVESTMENTS LTD
- 10 Indian Divas Who Never Got MarriedCRITICSUNION
- 15 most beautiful women in the worldCrazyFreelancer
- 13 annoying things NRIs do when they return to IndiaWIRAL GYAN
All Comments ()+^ Back to Top
Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive. Let's work together to keep the conversation civil.
HIDE