Deutsche Bank, Bank of America settle agency bond rigging lawsuits

Reuters  |  NEW YORK 

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - AG and Corp agreed to pay a combined $65.5 million to settle investor litigation accusing large banks rigging the roughly $9 trillion agency bond market over a decade.

Preliminary settlements totalling $48.5 million for and $17 million for were filed on Thursday with the U.S. District Court in Manhattan, and require a judge's approval. Both banks denied wrongdoing.

The settlements were the first in litigation accusing 10 banks engaging in a "brazen conspiracy" to rig the market for U.S. dollar-denominated supranational, sub-sovereign and agency (SSA) bonds, court papers show.

spokeswoman Oksana Poltavets and spokesman Lawrence Grayson declined to comment.

The investors are led by the Iron Workers Pension Plan Western Pennsylvania, KBC Asset Management NV, and the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan Northern California.

They accused banks communicating by phone, chatrooms and instant messaging to share pricing data and function as a collective "super-desk," while letting traders coordinate their strategies, to boost profit.

This collusion allegedly ran from 2005 to 2015, and forced customers to accept unfair prices on bonds they bought and sold, court papers show.

BNP Paribas SA , Citigroup Inc , Credit Agricole SA , Credit Suisse Group AG , HSBC Holdings Plc , Nomura Holdings Inc <8604.T>, Royal Canada and Toronto-Dominion were also sued, and all sought dismissals.

U.S. regulators have also examined possible manipulation in the SSA bond market.

The Manhattan court is home to a slew private litigation accusing big banks conspiring to rig various financial markets, interest rate benchmarks and commodities.

Late Wednesday night, another group investors sued six banks, claiming they rigged the more than $1 trillion stock lending market.

The SSA and stock loan litigation are being led by securities class action specialists, and the law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan is involved in both.

The case is In re: SSA Bonds Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District New York, No. 16-03711.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Andrew Hay)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)