U.S. top court rejects challenge to state retroactive tax changes

Reuters  |  WASHINGTON 

By Andrew Chung

(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme on Monday declined to hear a challenge by several major corporations to a Michigan that retroactively changed the way businesses are taxed in the state, leading to $1 billion extra for coffers.

The justices turned away appeals by Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co, IBM Corp, AT&T Inc's DirecTV, Monster Beverage Corp and others of a lower court's ruling in favor of the state. The companies argued that Michigan's retroactive change to its regime violated their rights to due process under the U.S. Constitution.

The Supreme also refused to take up an appeal by closely held Dot Foods Inc over a lower ruling favoring state in a similar retroactive dispute.

Before 2008, companies with activities in Michigan and outside the state could limit their liability by apportioning their income using a three-factor formula set out under a decades-old agreement called Multistate Compact, which took into account a company's sales, property and payroll in the state.

That compact, which Michigan joined in 1970, helped to avoid duplicative taxation of companies among member states.

Michigan's 2008 Business Act provided for apportionment based on sales alone. In 2014, the Michigan Supreme ruled that the act did not expressly repeal the compact's three-factor apportionment provision. That decision meant the state could lose $1 billion in already-collected revenue, Michigan said in papers.

In response, the state legislature rewrote the to correct what it called an erroneous interpretation by the The new expressly repealed the compact and applied it retroactively to 2008, saying that was the "original intent" of the legislature.

Dozens of companies filed suit against Michigan as far back as 2011 over the changes. But based on the 2014 legislation, Michigan's of Appeals dismissed them, saying the changes did not violate the companies' right to due process. The Michigan Supreme declined to review the cases last year.

The corporations urged the U.S. Supreme to hear their cases, saying that retroactive laws are becoming more common in the United States as a "ready source of revenue" for governments.

In the Dot Foods' case, a lower had upheld Washington's decision to close a loophole and apply the change to Illinois-based Dot Foods for the four years prior to the statute's enactment. Dot accused the state of violating its due process rights.

(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

U.S. top court rejects challenge to state retroactive tax changes

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a challenge by several major corporations to a Michigan law that retroactively changed the way businesses are taxed in the state, leading to $1 billion extra for government coffers.

By Andrew Chung

(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme on Monday declined to hear a challenge by several major corporations to a Michigan that retroactively changed the way businesses are taxed in the state, leading to $1 billion extra for coffers.

The justices turned away appeals by Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co, IBM Corp, AT&T Inc's DirecTV, Monster Beverage Corp and others of a lower court's ruling in favor of the state. The companies argued that Michigan's retroactive change to its regime violated their rights to due process under the U.S. Constitution.

The Supreme also refused to take up an appeal by closely held Dot Foods Inc over a lower ruling favoring state in a similar retroactive dispute.

Before 2008, companies with activities in Michigan and outside the state could limit their liability by apportioning their income using a three-factor formula set out under a decades-old agreement called Multistate Compact, which took into account a company's sales, property and payroll in the state.

That compact, which Michigan joined in 1970, helped to avoid duplicative taxation of companies among member states.

Michigan's 2008 Business Act provided for apportionment based on sales alone. In 2014, the Michigan Supreme ruled that the act did not expressly repeal the compact's three-factor apportionment provision. That decision meant the state could lose $1 billion in already-collected revenue, Michigan said in papers.

In response, the state legislature rewrote the to correct what it called an erroneous interpretation by the The new expressly repealed the compact and applied it retroactively to 2008, saying that was the "original intent" of the legislature.

Dozens of companies filed suit against Michigan as far back as 2011 over the changes. But based on the 2014 legislation, Michigan's of Appeals dismissed them, saying the changes did not violate the companies' right to due process. The Michigan Supreme declined to review the cases last year.

The corporations urged the U.S. Supreme to hear their cases, saying that retroactive laws are becoming more common in the United States as a "ready source of revenue" for governments.

In the Dot Foods' case, a lower had upheld Washington's decision to close a loophole and apply the change to Illinois-based Dot Foods for the four years prior to the statute's enactment. Dot accused the state of violating its due process rights.

(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22