Aircel-Maxis case: Court refuses to declare Marshall, Krishnan 'absconders'

ANI  |  New Delhi [India] 

A today refused to start proceedings on the plea of the (CBI) seeking to declare T. Ananda Krishnan and Augustus Ralph Marshall as absconders in the Aircel-Maxis case.

The adjourned sine die the case against the two accused Malaysian nationals.

In its last hearing, the had told the that more steps were needed to be taken to secure the presence of Krishnan and Marshall, who were charge-sheeted along with former Telecom Minister Dayanidhi Maran and his brother Kalanithi, in the case.

The (ED) on May 3 moved the High challenging the special court's order discharging former telecom minister Dayanidhi Maran, his industrialist brother Kalanidhi Maran and others in the Aircel-Maxis deal case.

Earlier on February 3, the ED moved to the Supreme against the special court's order on Aircel-Maxis case which discharged Maran brothers and other accused without furnishing the bail bond properly.

The ED also urged the apex to not release the properties attached in the case.

The Patiala House Court, a day before discharged former communications minister Dayanidhi Maran, his brother Kalanithi Maran after it found insufficient evidence to prosecute them.

Maran brothers were accused by investigating agencies of helping Malaysian group Maxis to acquire Aircel in exchange for a kickback of approximately Rs. 700 crore.

The also discharged Kalanithi's wife Kavery Kalanithi, South Asia FM Ltd (SAFL) Managing Director K. Shanmugam and two companies -- SAFL and Sun Direct TV Pvt Ltd (SDTPL) in two different cases.

The on December 19 last year deferred pronouncing its orders against the Maran brothers and others to December 22.

A special 2G had earlier on September 17 last year dismissed the applications filed by the ex-telecom minister and his brother, challenging its jurisdiction to try the Aircel-Maxis deal case in which they have been summoned as accused.

Pronouncing the order, the had then said, "There is no manner of doubt that by the standard of subject matter and periodicity of the alleged crime, the case fairly/squarely falls within the description/ designation of the 2G scam."

The Maran brothers challenged the jurisdiction of the special 2G in both cases lodged by the and the

The alleged that two firms, South Asia FM Limited (SAFL) and Sun Direct TV Private Ltd. (SDTPL), had received Rs. 742.58 crore as "proceeds of crime" from Mauritius-based firms and that the two firms were then allegedly controlled by Kalanithi Maran.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Aircel-Maxis case: Court refuses to declare Marshall, Krishnan 'absconders'

A Delhi court today refused to start proceedings on the plea of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) seeking to declare T. Ananda Krishnan and Augustus Ralph Marshall as absconders in the Aircel-Maxis case.The Court adjourned sine die the case against the two accused Malaysian nationals.In its last hearing, the CBI had told the court that more steps were needed to be taken to secure the presence of Krishnan and Marshall, who were charge-sheeted along with former Telecom Minister Dayanidhi Maran and his brother Kalanithi, in the case.The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on May 3 moved the Delhi High Court challenging the special court's order discharging former telecom minister Dayanidhi Maran, his industrialist brother Kalanidhi Maran and others in the Aircel-Maxis deal case.Earlier on February 3, the ED moved to the Supreme Court against the special court's order on Aircel-Maxis case which discharged Maran brothers and other accused without furnishing the bail bond properly.The ED ...

A today refused to start proceedings on the plea of the (CBI) seeking to declare T. Ananda Krishnan and Augustus Ralph Marshall as absconders in the Aircel-Maxis case.

The adjourned sine die the case against the two accused Malaysian nationals.

In its last hearing, the had told the that more steps were needed to be taken to secure the presence of Krishnan and Marshall, who were charge-sheeted along with former Telecom Minister Dayanidhi Maran and his brother Kalanithi, in the case.

The (ED) on May 3 moved the High challenging the special court's order discharging former telecom minister Dayanidhi Maran, his industrialist brother Kalanidhi Maran and others in the Aircel-Maxis deal case.

Earlier on February 3, the ED moved to the Supreme against the special court's order on Aircel-Maxis case which discharged Maran brothers and other accused without furnishing the bail bond properly.

The ED also urged the apex to not release the properties attached in the case.

The Patiala House Court, a day before discharged former communications minister Dayanidhi Maran, his brother Kalanithi Maran after it found insufficient evidence to prosecute them.

Maran brothers were accused by investigating agencies of helping Malaysian group Maxis to acquire Aircel in exchange for a kickback of approximately Rs. 700 crore.

The also discharged Kalanithi's wife Kavery Kalanithi, South Asia FM Ltd (SAFL) Managing Director K. Shanmugam and two companies -- SAFL and Sun Direct TV Pvt Ltd (SDTPL) in two different cases.

The on December 19 last year deferred pronouncing its orders against the Maran brothers and others to December 22.

A special 2G had earlier on September 17 last year dismissed the applications filed by the ex-telecom minister and his brother, challenging its jurisdiction to try the Aircel-Maxis deal case in which they have been summoned as accused.

Pronouncing the order, the had then said, "There is no manner of doubt that by the standard of subject matter and periodicity of the alleged crime, the case fairly/squarely falls within the description/ designation of the 2G scam."

The Maran brothers challenged the jurisdiction of the special 2G in both cases lodged by the and the

The alleged that two firms, South Asia FM Limited (SAFL) and Sun Direct TV Private Ltd. (SDTPL), had received Rs. 742.58 crore as "proceeds of crime" from Mauritius-based firms and that the two firms were then allegedly controlled by Kalanithi Maran.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22