Have limited time, will only focus on Triple Talaq now: SC

ANI  |  Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India] 

With the hearing over Triple Talaq entering its third day today, the Supreme has refused to hear all the three cases of Polygamy, Nikah and Halala at once, saying it will focus on one matter at a time.

Attorney General and top officers representing the Central arguing in front of the five judge Constitution bench said the apex should hear other cases also, beside Triple Talaq.

However, the top said that they have limited time, so all the matters could not be covered at present.

The Centre, earlier on May 11, told the apex that it opposes the triple talaq practice and wants to fight for women equality and gender justice.

However, All Muslim Personal Board (AIMPLB) counsel told the apex that Triple Talaq is a matter that comes under the Muslim board and therefore, in his opinion, the top should not interfere in it.

"The Central makes rules but in my opinion the apex should not interfere into it," Sibal said.

While hearing several pleas filed by Muslim women challenging the practice of triple talaq, the apex observed that it would examine whether the issue is fundamental to religion or not.

A five-judge bench of the apex further observed that it would not hear polygamy issue along with the triple talaq case.

Relentless debates on the validity and plausibility of this practice were instigated soon after one petitioner, Shayara Banu, challenged the Muslim personal over instantaneous application of triple talaq (talaq-e-bidat), polygamy and nikah-halala.

Supporting the stance of ending the practice of triple talaq, the Allahabad High had earlier asserted that the rights of any person, including Muslim women, cannot be violated in the name of 'personal law'.

In December last year, the Allahabad High termed the Islamic practice of divorcing a woman by uttering the word "talaq" thrice "unconstitutional."

The further observed that triple talaq sanctioned under Muslim Personal that governs marriage, property and divorce violates the rights of Muslim women.

"Triple talaq is unconstitutional. It violates the rights of Muslim women," ruled the high court, adding that no personal board was above the Constitution.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Have limited time, will only focus on Triple Talaq now: SC

With the hearing over Triple Talaq entering its third day today, the Supreme Court has refused to hear all the three cases of Polygamy, Nikah and Halala at once, saying it will focus on one matter at a time.Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi and top law officers representing the Central government arguing in front of the five judge Constitution bench said the apex court should hear other cases also, beside Triple Talaq.However, the top court said that they have limited time, so all the matters could not be covered at present.The Centre, earlier on May 11, told the apex court that it opposes the triple talaq practice and wants to fight for women equality and gender justice.However, All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) counsel Kapil Sibal told the apex court that Triple Talaq is a matter that comes under the Muslim board and therefore, in his opinion, the top court should not interfere in it."The Central Government makes rules but in my opinion the apex court should not interfere ...

With the hearing over Triple Talaq entering its third day today, the Supreme has refused to hear all the three cases of Polygamy, Nikah and Halala at once, saying it will focus on one matter at a time.

Attorney General and top officers representing the Central arguing in front of the five judge Constitution bench said the apex should hear other cases also, beside Triple Talaq.

However, the top said that they have limited time, so all the matters could not be covered at present.

The Centre, earlier on May 11, told the apex that it opposes the triple talaq practice and wants to fight for women equality and gender justice.

However, All Muslim Personal Board (AIMPLB) counsel told the apex that Triple Talaq is a matter that comes under the Muslim board and therefore, in his opinion, the top should not interfere in it.

"The Central makes rules but in my opinion the apex should not interfere into it," Sibal said.

While hearing several pleas filed by Muslim women challenging the practice of triple talaq, the apex observed that it would examine whether the issue is fundamental to religion or not.

A five-judge bench of the apex further observed that it would not hear polygamy issue along with the triple talaq case.

Relentless debates on the validity and plausibility of this practice were instigated soon after one petitioner, Shayara Banu, challenged the Muslim personal over instantaneous application of triple talaq (talaq-e-bidat), polygamy and nikah-halala.

Supporting the stance of ending the practice of triple talaq, the Allahabad High had earlier asserted that the rights of any person, including Muslim women, cannot be violated in the name of 'personal law'.

In December last year, the Allahabad High termed the Islamic practice of divorcing a woman by uttering the word "talaq" thrice "unconstitutional."

The further observed that triple talaq sanctioned under Muslim Personal that governs marriage, property and divorce violates the rights of Muslim women.

"Triple talaq is unconstitutional. It violates the rights of Muslim women," ruled the high court, adding that no personal board was above the Constitution.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22