Intel-Samsung duo backs lawsuit against Qualcomm

Samsung claims its in-house chip unit is artificially held back by Qualcomm

Ian King 

Qualcomm
Qualcomm is trying to fend off a series of legal and regulatory challenges to its business practices around the world, including a suit by Apple, one of its largest customers

Electronics Co. and Corp. weighed in with their own gripes about Inc. while cheering on the US Federal Trade Commission’s lawsuit accusing the chipmaker of trying to corner the market for semiconductors used in smartphones.
 
The South Korean company, one of Qualcomm’s largest customers, and Intel, one of its biggest competitors, filed arguments Friday in support of the FTC’s case against Both contend the San Diego-based company stops them from competing fairly against it by leveraging patents that cover the fundamentals of modern phone systems.


 
is ready, willing, and able to compete on the merits in this market that has dominated for years,” said in a posting on its website. “But has maintained an interlocking web of abusive patent and commercial practices that subverts competition on the merits.”
 
claims its in-house chip unit is artificially held back by Qualcomm’s unwillingness to licence its technology.
 
Licence refused
 
“Despite having requested a licence from Qualcomm, cannot sell licensed Exynos chipsets to non-entities because has refused to licence to make and sell licensed chipsets,” said in a filing. Samsung, the world’s biggest smartphone maker, uses a mixture of suppliers — including itself and — for the crucial components in its handsets.
 
didn’t immediately respond to requests seeking comment on the filings.
 
The company is trying to fend off a series of legal and regulatory challenges to its business practices around the world, including a suit by Apple Inc., one of its largest customers. The chipmaker gets most of its profits from selling the rights to use patents that are essential to all modern mobile phone systems. Many of the cases target the link between those license fees and its semiconductor business.
 
Earlier Friday, the urged a judge to reject Qualcomm’s request for dismissal of the agency’s case. The allegations “present a forceful antitrust case,” the commission said in a filing in federal court in San Jose, California. A hearing is set for June 15.
 
General Counsel Don Rosenberg said last month that the FTC’s complaint is riddled with “fallacies and failures.”
 
“The Federal Trade Commission’s latest submission to the court does nothing to cure the fundamental flaws in its complaint against Qualcomm: no coherent theory of competitive harm and no allegations of the type of conduct that the antitrust laws are designed to address,” said Friday in a statement. “The complaint therefore should be dismissed.”
 
Shares of Qualcomm, the world’s fourth-largest chipmaker, have slumped this year on concern that the growing legal challenges will hurt its main source of profit. The stock has lost 15 per cent in 2017 compared with a 15 per cent gain by the benchmark Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Index.          

Intel-Samsung duo backs lawsuit against Qualcomm

Samsung claims its in-house chip unit is artificially held back by Qualcomm

Samsung claims its in-house chip unit is artificially held back by Qualcomm Electronics Co. and Corp. weighed in with their own gripes about Inc. while cheering on the US Federal Trade Commission’s lawsuit accusing the chipmaker of trying to corner the market for semiconductors used in smartphones.
 
The South Korean company, one of Qualcomm’s largest customers, and Intel, one of its biggest competitors, filed arguments Friday in support of the FTC’s case against Both contend the San Diego-based company stops them from competing fairly against it by leveraging patents that cover the fundamentals of modern phone systems.
 
is ready, willing, and able to compete on the merits in this market that has dominated for years,” said in a posting on its website. “But has maintained an interlocking web of abusive patent and commercial practices that subverts competition on the merits.”
 
claims its in-house chip unit is artificially held back by Qualcomm’s unwillingness to licence its technology.
 
Licence refused
 
“Despite having requested a licence from Qualcomm, cannot sell licensed Exynos chipsets to non-entities because has refused to licence to make and sell licensed chipsets,” said in a filing. Samsung, the world’s biggest smartphone maker, uses a mixture of suppliers — including itself and — for the crucial components in its handsets.
 
didn’t immediately respond to requests seeking comment on the filings.
 
The company is trying to fend off a series of legal and regulatory challenges to its business practices around the world, including a suit by Apple Inc., one of its largest customers. The chipmaker gets most of its profits from selling the rights to use patents that are essential to all modern mobile phone systems. Many of the cases target the link between those license fees and its semiconductor business.
 
Earlier Friday, the urged a judge to reject Qualcomm’s request for dismissal of the agency’s case. The allegations “present a forceful antitrust case,” the commission said in a filing in federal court in San Jose, California. A hearing is set for June 15.
 
General Counsel Don Rosenberg said last month that the FTC’s complaint is riddled with “fallacies and failures.”
 
“The Federal Trade Commission’s latest submission to the court does nothing to cure the fundamental flaws in its complaint against Qualcomm: no coherent theory of competitive harm and no allegations of the type of conduct that the antitrust laws are designed to address,” said Friday in a statement. “The complaint therefore should be dismissed.”
 
Shares of Qualcomm, the world’s fourth-largest chipmaker, have slumped this year on concern that the growing legal challenges will hurt its main source of profit. The stock has lost 15 per cent in 2017 compared with a 15 per cent gain by the benchmark Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Index.          
image
Business Standard
177 22