SC seeks Chhattisgarh, CRPF's response on encounter killings

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The Supreme today directed the and to respond to a seeking transfer of a plea pending in the High for a court-monitored probe into alleged extra-judicial killings in the state.

A bench of Justices and Deepak Gupta issued notices to the state and the (CRPF) after it was told that the apex is already seized of a similar matter dealing with identical questions of which has been raised.



Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioners, told the bench that the apex was dealing with the matter filed by Nandini Sundar and the issues raised in the plea before high was similar to the one which is being adjudicated upon here.

He said that the matter pending in the high should be transferred to the apex

The apex court, in July 2011, had declared as illegal and unconstitutional the deployment of tribal youths as special police officers or members of 'Salwa Judum' or any other force in in counter-insurgency against the Maoist.

The order had come on a filed by Nandini Sundar and others.

During the hearing today, Bhushan said the high had refrained from going ahead with the matter pending before it as the apex is already hearing a similar matter.

The plea, filed by Suneeta Pottam, Munni Pottam and an NGO women against sexual violence and state repression, said the matter pending in the high "deals with several extra judicial executions by police and security forces that have occurred in the state of during the course of the counter-insurgency campaign".

"While the security forces claim that these cases are of ambush of security forces by Naxalites and the ensuing deaths have resulted due to firing in self defence, the villagers and family members of the deceased assert that these are killings of unarmed villagers, who have been executed in cold-blood by security forces," the plea claimed.

The said the plea pending before the apex highlights instances of encounters and human rights violations in the state and in both the matters, the petitioners have sought court-monitored investigation in cases of encounter deaths in

"Thus, both the petitions are aiming at an effective as well as a comprehensive mechanism to deal with, investigate and monitor incidents of encounter killings and gross human rights violations in the state of and provide justice to the families that have suffered due to such excesses committed by the state," it said.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

SC seeks Chhattisgarh, CRPF's response on encounter killings

The Supreme Court today directed the Chhattisgarh Government and CRPF to respond to a petition seeking transfer of a plea pending in the High Court for a court-monitored probe into alleged extra-judicial killings in the state. A bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta issued notices to the state government and the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) after it was told that the apex court is already seized of a similar matter dealing with identical questions of law which has been raised. Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioners, told the bench that the apex court was dealing with the matter filed by Nandini Sundar and the issues raised in the plea before high court was similar to the one which is being adjudicated upon here. He said that the matter pending in the high court should be transferred to the apex court. The apex court, in July 2011, had declared as illegal and unconstitutional the deployment of tribal youths as special police officers or members ... The Supreme today directed the and to respond to a seeking transfer of a plea pending in the High for a court-monitored probe into alleged extra-judicial killings in the state.

A bench of Justices and Deepak Gupta issued notices to the state and the (CRPF) after it was told that the apex is already seized of a similar matter dealing with identical questions of which has been raised.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioners, told the bench that the apex was dealing with the matter filed by Nandini Sundar and the issues raised in the plea before high was similar to the one which is being adjudicated upon here.

He said that the matter pending in the high should be transferred to the apex

The apex court, in July 2011, had declared as illegal and unconstitutional the deployment of tribal youths as special police officers or members of 'Salwa Judum' or any other force in in counter-insurgency against the Maoist.

The order had come on a filed by Nandini Sundar and others.

During the hearing today, Bhushan said the high had refrained from going ahead with the matter pending before it as the apex is already hearing a similar matter.

The plea, filed by Suneeta Pottam, Munni Pottam and an NGO women against sexual violence and state repression, said the matter pending in the high "deals with several extra judicial executions by police and security forces that have occurred in the state of during the course of the counter-insurgency campaign".

"While the security forces claim that these cases are of ambush of security forces by Naxalites and the ensuing deaths have resulted due to firing in self defence, the villagers and family members of the deceased assert that these are killings of unarmed villagers, who have been executed in cold-blood by security forces," the plea claimed.

The said the plea pending before the apex highlights instances of encounters and human rights violations in the state and in both the matters, the petitioners have sought court-monitored investigation in cases of encounter deaths in

"Thus, both the petitions are aiming at an effective as well as a comprehensive mechanism to deal with, investigate and monitor incidents of encounter killings and gross human rights violations in the state of and provide justice to the families that have suffered due to such excesses committed by the state," it said.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22