Highway liquor ban: SC to hear plea against denotifying Chandigarh roads

CJI said decision to denotify must have been taken to ensure the flow of funds to maintain roads

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Photo: Subrata Majumdar
Photo: Subrata Majumdar

The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear after summer vacation a plea challenging a decision of administration to denotify certain roads allegedly with an aim to "circumvent" its verdict banning vends within 500 metres from the state and

A bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar, however, observed that the decision to denotify must have been taken to ensure the flow of funds required to maintain the roads.



However, it later said it was not expressing any opinion and simply posting the matter for hearing in July after the summer break.

The Union Territory of Chandigarh, on March 16, issued a notification denotifying 12 highway stretches that pass through the garden city.

An NGO, Arrive Safe Society, of has alleged that the administration issued the notification to bypass Supreme Court's December 15, 2016 order banning vends in and state

The had moved the top court after and High Court dismissed its plea holding that it could not refer any law which has been violated while issuing the said notification.

"To circumvent and scuttle down the effect of the orders/ directions passed by this court on December 15 last year, the administration has come up with the idea of denotifying the already notified state and declaring them as 'major district roads' vide notification dated March 16," the plea said while seeking stay on the implementation of the notification.'

On March 31, the apex court had ruled that vends within 500 metres of and state will have to shut down, while exempting the hill states of Sikkim, Meghalaya and Himachal Pradesh and areas having a population of up to 20,000.

On the issue of non-extension of vends' licences beyond March 31, the apex court said the licences given before December 15, 2016, will be valid till September 30 in case of Telangana and they would be operational till June 30 in Andhra Pradesh.

The court's decision came on pleas seeking a relook at its verdict banning vends within 500 metres of and state from April 1 with Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi having said that the judgement needs rectification as the "budget of the states will go for a six".

Highway liquor ban: SC to hear plea against denotifying Chandigarh roads

CJI said decision to denotify must have been taken to ensure the flow of funds to maintain roads

CJI said decision to denotify must have been taken to ensure the flow of funds to maintain roads The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear after summer vacation a plea challenging a decision of administration to denotify certain roads allegedly with an aim to "circumvent" its verdict banning vends within 500 metres from the state and

A bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar, however, observed that the decision to denotify must have been taken to ensure the flow of funds required to maintain the roads.

However, it later said it was not expressing any opinion and simply posting the matter for hearing in July after the summer break.

The Union Territory of Chandigarh, on March 16, issued a notification denotifying 12 highway stretches that pass through the garden city.

An NGO, Arrive Safe Society, of has alleged that the administration issued the notification to bypass Supreme Court's December 15, 2016 order banning vends in and state

The had moved the top court after and High Court dismissed its plea holding that it could not refer any law which has been violated while issuing the said notification.

"To circumvent and scuttle down the effect of the orders/ directions passed by this court on December 15 last year, the administration has come up with the idea of denotifying the already notified state and declaring them as 'major district roads' vide notification dated March 16," the plea said while seeking stay on the implementation of the notification.'

On March 31, the apex court had ruled that vends within 500 metres of and state will have to shut down, while exempting the hill states of Sikkim, Meghalaya and Himachal Pradesh and areas having a population of up to 20,000.

On the issue of non-extension of vends' licences beyond March 31, the apex court said the licences given before December 15, 2016, will be valid till September 30 in case of Telangana and they would be operational till June 30 in Andhra Pradesh.

The court's decision came on pleas seeking a relook at its verdict banning vends within 500 metres of and state from April 1 with Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi having said that the judgement needs rectification as the "budget of the states will go for a six".
image
Business Standard
177 22