SYL Canal Issue: Supreme Court adjourns matter till April 27

ANI  |  New Delhi [India] 

The Supreme on Wednesday adjourned the Sutlej Yamuna Link (SYL) Canal matter to April 27 for further hearing.

The final hearing was put off after the Centre informed the that a meeting of and has been convened by it on April 20 to resolve the matter.

The court, however, made it clear that if a solution was not found, it would proceed with the matter on the next date of hearing.

The bench, also comprising of Justice Amitava Roy, considered the statement of Solicitor General, Ranjeet Kumar and deferred the hearing in the case.

Earlier this month, the apex refused to hear the Government's plea to adjourn the SYL Canal matter till the were announced and posted the matter for further hearing till February 22.

Senior lawyer Ram Jethmalani, appearing for the government, sought an adjournment which the top refused.

A bench headed by Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghosh refused the plea and asked, "What has the Supreme to do with the "

In January, the apex asked both the and Governments to file their replies on the issue within three weeks.

The had earlier sought more time from the to file a detailed reply on the same.

A bench of the headed by Justice Ghosh and Justice Amitava Roy granted the decision.

The apex had, in November last year, termed the law passed by the in 2004 to terminate the SYL Canal water sharing agreement with neighbouring states as 'unconstitutional'.

Holding that the Termination of Agreement Act, 2004 was not being in conformity with the provisions of the Constitution, the top answered in the negative to all four questions referred to it in a presidential reference.

A constitution bench of the ruled that could not and should not have taken a 'unilateral' decision to terminate the agreement with Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi and Chandigarh to share the Ravi-Beas river waters.

The ruling was also followed by resignations of Pradesh Congress Committee president Captain Amarinder Singh and state Congress MLAs.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

SYL Canal Issue: Supreme Court adjourns matter till April 27

The Supreme Court on Wednesday adjourned the Sutlej Yamuna Link (SYL) Canal matter to April 27 for further hearing.The final hearing was put off after the Centre informed the court that a meeting of Punjab and Haryana has been convened by it on April 20 to resolve the matter.The court, however, made it clear that if a solution was not found, it would proceed with the matter on the next date of hearing.The bench, also comprising of Justice Amitava Roy, considered the statement of Solicitor General, Ranjeet Kumar and deferred the hearing in the case.Earlier this month, the apex court refused to hear the Punjab Government's plea to adjourn the SYL Canal matter till the election results were announced and posted the matter for further hearing till February 22.Senior lawyer Ram Jethmalani, appearing for the Punjab government, sought an adjournment which the top court refused.A bench headed by Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghosh refused the plea and asked, "What has the Supreme Court to do with ...

The Supreme on Wednesday adjourned the Sutlej Yamuna Link (SYL) Canal matter to April 27 for further hearing.

The final hearing was put off after the Centre informed the that a meeting of and has been convened by it on April 20 to resolve the matter.

The court, however, made it clear that if a solution was not found, it would proceed with the matter on the next date of hearing.

The bench, also comprising of Justice Amitava Roy, considered the statement of Solicitor General, Ranjeet Kumar and deferred the hearing in the case.

Earlier this month, the apex refused to hear the Government's plea to adjourn the SYL Canal matter till the were announced and posted the matter for further hearing till February 22.

Senior lawyer Ram Jethmalani, appearing for the government, sought an adjournment which the top refused.

A bench headed by Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghosh refused the plea and asked, "What has the Supreme to do with the "

In January, the apex asked both the and Governments to file their replies on the issue within three weeks.

The had earlier sought more time from the to file a detailed reply on the same.

A bench of the headed by Justice Ghosh and Justice Amitava Roy granted the decision.

The apex had, in November last year, termed the law passed by the in 2004 to terminate the SYL Canal water sharing agreement with neighbouring states as 'unconstitutional'.

Holding that the Termination of Agreement Act, 2004 was not being in conformity with the provisions of the Constitution, the top answered in the negative to all four questions referred to it in a presidential reference.

A constitution bench of the ruled that could not and should not have taken a 'unilateral' decision to terminate the agreement with Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi and Chandigarh to share the Ravi-Beas river waters.

The ruling was also followed by resignations of Pradesh Congress Committee president Captain Amarinder Singh and state Congress MLAs.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22