Utah Supreme Court rules against Tesla in push to sell all-electric cars

It argued that Utah law only blocks car makers from owning a dealership that's set up as a franchise

AP | PTI  |  Salt Lake City 

A Tesla showroom in Hong Kong
A Tesla showroom in Hong Kong

Tesla's push to sell its all-electric vehicles in hit another roadblock when the state upheld a decision by licensing officials to deny the automaker a license to sell new cars.

had argued that a state barring car manufacturers from owning dealerships didn't apply to the company. sells its cars directly to customers rather than using independent dealerships, something attorneys argued is vital to their business.



must sell its own cars because a sale depends on convincing customers that electric cars are better than those with a gas engine. The company also argued that doesn't block car makers from selling directly, it only blocks car makers from owning a dealership that's set up as a franchise.

In the decision today, justices didn't address whether blocks a car maker from selling its vehicles directly or whether it's vital for the car maker to sell its own product.

The justices instead focused on a subsidiary company that set up to sell cars in the state, called UT. UT applied for an auto dealer license, and because UT is wholly owned by Tesla, state licensing officials were correct in a 2015 decision denying the license, the justices wrote.

In a statement, said the ruling was "disappointing for and all consumers interested in consumer choice, free markets, and sustainable energy." The company said it will pursue all options in and will continue offering service in for cars.

The Automobile Dealers Association has argued that is required by to comply with the franchise law, which is designed to keep large car makers like GM from pushing out independent dealers selling the same cars.

has said that protects a monopoly by locally powerful car dealerships and violates free-market economic policies in Utah's constitution.

An effort to try to change the earlier and accommodate failed in Utah's Legislature earlier last year after the company pulled its support, saying the fix wouldn't allow it to keep any inventory in the state.

Unable to sell cars through its $3 million showroom in Salt Lake City, instead decided to take its fight to Utah's

The company has a used-car license for its Salt Lake City showroom, which allows people to test-drive and buy used cars but not new cars.

Utah Supreme Court rules against Tesla in push to sell all-electric cars

It argued that Utah law only blocks car makers from owning a dealership that's set up as a franchise

It argued that Utah law only blocks car makers from owning a dealership that's set up as a franchise Tesla's push to sell its all-electric vehicles in hit another roadblock when the state upheld a decision by licensing officials to deny the automaker a license to sell new cars.

had argued that a state barring car manufacturers from owning dealerships didn't apply to the company. sells its cars directly to customers rather than using independent dealerships, something attorneys argued is vital to their business.

must sell its own cars because a sale depends on convincing customers that electric cars are better than those with a gas engine. The company also argued that doesn't block car makers from selling directly, it only blocks car makers from owning a dealership that's set up as a franchise.

In the decision today, justices didn't address whether blocks a car maker from selling its vehicles directly or whether it's vital for the car maker to sell its own product.

The justices instead focused on a subsidiary company that set up to sell cars in the state, called UT. UT applied for an auto dealer license, and because UT is wholly owned by Tesla, state licensing officials were correct in a 2015 decision denying the license, the justices wrote.

In a statement, said the ruling was "disappointing for and all consumers interested in consumer choice, free markets, and sustainable energy." The company said it will pursue all options in and will continue offering service in for cars.

The Automobile Dealers Association has argued that is required by to comply with the franchise law, which is designed to keep large car makers like GM from pushing out independent dealers selling the same cars.

has said that protects a monopoly by locally powerful car dealerships and violates free-market economic policies in Utah's constitution.

An effort to try to change the earlier and accommodate failed in Utah's Legislature earlier last year after the company pulled its support, saying the fix wouldn't allow it to keep any inventory in the state.

Unable to sell cars through its $3 million showroom in Salt Lake City, instead decided to take its fight to Utah's

The company has a used-car license for its Salt Lake City showroom, which allows people to test-drive and buy used cars but not new cars.
image
Business Standard
177 22