Goa govt mulling to approach SC over booze ban: Parrikar

Press Trust of India  |  Panaji 

Chief Minister today said the state is considering moving the Supreme for "clarification" on its order banning along

He said the may also seek to get a "special consideration" from the apex for the tourist state.



"Following the Supreme order pronounced on March 31, around 1,000 out of 3,000-odd outlets (in Goa) that were facing closure, have got a respite," Parrikar told reporters.

Earlier in the day, he held a series of meetings with the traders and other affected bodies including the Travel and Tourism Association of (TTAG).

"Now the issue is of only 2,000 outlets. feels that the state should have been given some special dispensation, but that right (lies) with the SC. To approach the apex court, we need to do proper documentation," the chief minister said.

He stated that the has already begun analysing the order.

The SC on March 31 modified its order banning vends within 500 metres on national and state highways, reducing the distance to 220 metres in areas having a population of up to 20,000.

However, a bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar, made it clear that its December 15, 2016 order banning such vends within 500 metres of shall remain operative for areas other than specified in the latest order.

Goa, the famous beach destination for domestic and international tourists, is also known for cheap

"We are contemplating the possibility of approaching the SC for proper clarification (on the order), and possibly (seek) some special consideration for the state," Parrikar added.

In the wake of the apex order, the state is working out a strategy to protect the affected vends from the impact.

"The will not charge any additional fees from such establishments that file applications to shift their premises outside 500 metres or 220 metres (which is the distance criteria mentioned in the SC order)," he said.

Parrikar said these establishments will be permitted to shift to new premises, "provided the premises fit into the criteria proposed by the Excise Rules and Regulations."

The state has also "kept open the option" for the affected outlets to sell their licenses to other persons, provided the new licensee operates from the premises which are outside the banned areas.

"The facility to shift to new premises or sell licenses would be made available for three years from now," the chief minister said.

He said the state will also take a review of a notification pertaining to

"There are some which are yet to be denotified despite parallel being constructed in the form of bypasses," Parrikar said.

He said that the concerned departments have been asked to study files and give exact status about the in

Parrikar said that wholesale licence holders, distributors and distilleries are not covered under the SC order "as it mentions only about the sale to the consumers."

"The special zones like Naval enclaves, airport and other areas where common people do not have access will not be covered under this (apex court's) order," he added.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Goa govt mulling to approach SC over booze ban: Parrikar

Goa Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar today said the state government is considering moving the Supreme Court for "clarification" on its order banning liquor along highways. He said the government may also seek to get a "special consideration" from the apex court for the tourist state. "Following the Supreme Court order pronounced on March 31, around 1,000 out of 3,000-odd outlets (in Goa) that were facing closure, have got a respite," Parrikar told reporters. Earlier in the day, he held a series of meetings with the liquor traders and other affected bodies including the Travel and Tourism Association of Goa (TTAG). "Now the issue is of only 2,000 outlets. Goa Government feels that the state should have been given some special dispensation, but that right (lies) with the SC. To approach the apex court, we need to do proper documentation," the chief minister said. He stated that the government has already begun analysing the order. The SC on March 31 modified its order banning ... Chief Minister today said the state is considering moving the Supreme for "clarification" on its order banning along

He said the may also seek to get a "special consideration" from the apex for the tourist state.

"Following the Supreme order pronounced on March 31, around 1,000 out of 3,000-odd outlets (in Goa) that were facing closure, have got a respite," Parrikar told reporters.

Earlier in the day, he held a series of meetings with the traders and other affected bodies including the Travel and Tourism Association of (TTAG).

"Now the issue is of only 2,000 outlets. feels that the state should have been given some special dispensation, but that right (lies) with the SC. To approach the apex court, we need to do proper documentation," the chief minister said.

He stated that the has already begun analysing the order.

The SC on March 31 modified its order banning vends within 500 metres on national and state highways, reducing the distance to 220 metres in areas having a population of up to 20,000.

However, a bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar, made it clear that its December 15, 2016 order banning such vends within 500 metres of shall remain operative for areas other than specified in the latest order.

Goa, the famous beach destination for domestic and international tourists, is also known for cheap

"We are contemplating the possibility of approaching the SC for proper clarification (on the order), and possibly (seek) some special consideration for the state," Parrikar added.

In the wake of the apex order, the state is working out a strategy to protect the affected vends from the impact.

"The will not charge any additional fees from such establishments that file applications to shift their premises outside 500 metres or 220 metres (which is the distance criteria mentioned in the SC order)," he said.

Parrikar said these establishments will be permitted to shift to new premises, "provided the premises fit into the criteria proposed by the Excise Rules and Regulations."

The state has also "kept open the option" for the affected outlets to sell their licenses to other persons, provided the new licensee operates from the premises which are outside the banned areas.

"The facility to shift to new premises or sell licenses would be made available for three years from now," the chief minister said.

He said the state will also take a review of a notification pertaining to

"There are some which are yet to be denotified despite parallel being constructed in the form of bypasses," Parrikar said.

He said that the concerned departments have been asked to study files and give exact status about the in

Parrikar said that wholesale licence holders, distributors and distilleries are not covered under the SC order "as it mentions only about the sale to the consumers."

"The special zones like Naval enclaves, airport and other areas where common people do not have access will not be covered under this (apex court's) order," he added.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22