India using Kashmir as an excuse to oppose Silk Road project: Chinese media

The article said that India should give up its 'biased' view on the Belt and Road initiative

Press Trust of India  |  Beijing 

India using Kashmir as an excuse to oppose Silk Road project: Chinese media

sees China's Silk Road initiative as a geopolitical competition and is using the Kashmir issue as an "unfounded excuse" to oppose the ambitious project, Chinese state media today alleged and asked to "abandon" its "cliche mentality".

"The official reason the Indian rejected the offer to join the initiative (Silk Road) is that it is designed to pass through Kashmir. However, it is just an unfounded excuse as has been maintaining a consistent position on the Kashmir issue, which has never changed," one of the two articles on by state-run Global Times said.



"sees the Belt and Road initiative as a geopolitical competition," the article said, criticising for hindering Beijing's push into South and the world with multi-billion which is also known as the 'Belt and Road' (BR).

"Whether to continue to boycott or join the Belt and Road remains a conundrum for New Delhi," it said adding that, is the only one which can help itself.

The article said that should give up its "biased" view on the BR initiative.

"It is high time to abandon the cliche mentality of associating everything with geopolitics. will surely see a different world if it does," the article said.

Referring to India's reservations to attend the BR summit called by Chinese President Xi Jinping, the article said it may be an "embarrassing occasion" for as the meeting is backed by "China's peripheral countries, notably Russia, Indonesia, Kazakhstan and Pakistan".

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi recently said 20 heads of state will attend the summit, together with over 50 leaders from international organisations, over 100 ministerial officials and more than 1,200 guests from around the world.

The article referred to a comment by Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar during his visit here last month to co-chair the upgraded India-strategic dialogue, saying is examining China's invitation to attend the summit and "how a country whose sovereignty has been violated can come on aninvitation".

In the meantime, however, state-run Chinese media stepped up campaign to pressurise to join the summit.

apparently is keen about India's participation in the summit as the project struggled to make headway in the region except the USD 46 billion Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) where both Beijing-Islamabad are putting all efforts to show early harvest.

Media reports here said that Xi plans to invite his US counterpart to attend the meeting during their first summit early next month in Florida.

BR consisted of maze of roads, including CPEC, Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic (BCIM) Corridor and 21st Maritime Silk Road besides road network to connect with Eurasia.

The article also said, "it seems that the mainstream opinion throughout is that the connectivity brought about by BR initiative is geopolitically significant. Therefore, cannot allow the initiative to expand further into South Asia".

"This could also explain why the BCIM has seen no progress since its proposed by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang in 2013, and also why has been keen on Japan's investment in the Iranian port of Chabahar," it said.

"may also feel embarrassed as Moscow has actively responded to the Belt and Road initiative and will build an economic corridor with and Mongolia," it said, adding Russia and Iran seeking to join the CPEC putting "in a more awkward position".

It said, "has expressed, on various occasions, its anticipation to see join the grand project and to make concerted effort with in building economic corridors involving China, India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh and Myanmar".

Another article in the same daily said a "benign" competition between and may help development in South but they should avoid "cut-throat" rivalry.

"The so-called dragon-elephant contention is perhaps a blow against strategic mutual trust between and New Delhi, but may be conducive to development in South Asia," it said.

Accusing of not being "generous" to its neighbours, it said "a yawning infrastructure funding gap in South Asian countries creates space for and those nations to strengthen economic cooperation".

"Bangladesh and signed 27 deals worth billions of dollars during President Xi Jinping's visit last year," it said, adding China's BR initiative has received an increasing amount of attention from Bangladesh.

"Only by investing more resources in regional integration and extending the benefits from India's rapid economic growth to other South Asian countries can maintain its influence in the region," it said.

"Benign competition between and will be conducive to development in South The question remaining is how to avoid cut-throat competition as and jostle for influence. and should seek common ground while strengthening cooperation with South Asian countries to promote regional integration," it said.

India using Kashmir as an excuse to oppose Silk Road project: Chinese media

The article said that India should give up its 'biased' view on the Belt and Road initiative

The article said that India should give up its 'biased' view on the Belt and Road initiative sees China's Silk Road initiative as a geopolitical competition and is using the Kashmir issue as an "unfounded excuse" to oppose the ambitious project, Chinese state media today alleged and asked to "abandon" its "cliche mentality".

"The official reason the Indian rejected the offer to join the initiative (Silk Road) is that it is designed to pass through Kashmir. However, it is just an unfounded excuse as has been maintaining a consistent position on the Kashmir issue, which has never changed," one of the two articles on by state-run Global Times said.

"sees the Belt and Road initiative as a geopolitical competition," the article said, criticising for hindering Beijing's push into South and the world with multi-billion which is also known as the 'Belt and Road' (BR).

"Whether to continue to boycott or join the Belt and Road remains a conundrum for New Delhi," it said adding that, is the only one which can help itself.

The article said that should give up its "biased" view on the BR initiative.

"It is high time to abandon the cliche mentality of associating everything with geopolitics. will surely see a different world if it does," the article said.

Referring to India's reservations to attend the BR summit called by Chinese President Xi Jinping, the article said it may be an "embarrassing occasion" for as the meeting is backed by "China's peripheral countries, notably Russia, Indonesia, Kazakhstan and Pakistan".

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi recently said 20 heads of state will attend the summit, together with over 50 leaders from international organisations, over 100 ministerial officials and more than 1,200 guests from around the world.

The article referred to a comment by Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar during his visit here last month to co-chair the upgraded India-strategic dialogue, saying is examining China's invitation to attend the summit and "how a country whose sovereignty has been violated can come on aninvitation".

In the meantime, however, state-run Chinese media stepped up campaign to pressurise to join the summit.

apparently is keen about India's participation in the summit as the project struggled to make headway in the region except the USD 46 billion Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) where both Beijing-Islamabad are putting all efforts to show early harvest.

Media reports here said that Xi plans to invite his US counterpart to attend the meeting during their first summit early next month in Florida.

BR consisted of maze of roads, including CPEC, Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic (BCIM) Corridor and 21st Maritime Silk Road besides road network to connect with Eurasia.

The article also said, "it seems that the mainstream opinion throughout is that the connectivity brought about by BR initiative is geopolitically significant. Therefore, cannot allow the initiative to expand further into South Asia".

"This could also explain why the BCIM has seen no progress since its proposed by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang in 2013, and also why has been keen on Japan's investment in the Iranian port of Chabahar," it said.

"may also feel embarrassed as Moscow has actively responded to the Belt and Road initiative and will build an economic corridor with and Mongolia," it said, adding Russia and Iran seeking to join the CPEC putting "in a more awkward position".

It said, "has expressed, on various occasions, its anticipation to see join the grand project and to make concerted effort with in building economic corridors involving China, India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh and Myanmar".

Another article in the same daily said a "benign" competition between and may help development in South but they should avoid "cut-throat" rivalry.

"The so-called dragon-elephant contention is perhaps a blow against strategic mutual trust between and New Delhi, but may be conducive to development in South Asia," it said.

Accusing of not being "generous" to its neighbours, it said "a yawning infrastructure funding gap in South Asian countries creates space for and those nations to strengthen economic cooperation".

"Bangladesh and signed 27 deals worth billions of dollars during President Xi Jinping's visit last year," it said, adding China's BR initiative has received an increasing amount of attention from Bangladesh.

"Only by investing more resources in regional integration and extending the benefits from India's rapid economic growth to other South Asian countries can maintain its influence in the region," it said.

"Benign competition between and will be conducive to development in South The question remaining is how to avoid cut-throat competition as and jostle for influence. and should seek common ground while strengthening cooperation with South Asian countries to promote regional integration," it said.
image
Business Standard
177 22