Letters: Interference not needed

Gaikwad was at fault and there is no reason why he and his party should not apologise to employee

Business Standard 

With reference to the editorial, “Does not fly”, Member of Parliament (MP) Ravindra Gaikwad’s conduct was as unbecoming as the government’s plan to finalise rules about the airlines’ no-fly list and the Lok Sabha Speaker’s acceptance of a privilege motion of the on this issue.
 
The has been an ally of the in Maharashtra, but that does not mean the latter should ignore the unacceptable behaviour of a MP.


 
By trying to draft guidelines for a no-fly list, the government has shown apathy towards the employee who was at the receiving end of Gaikwad’s misbehaviour. Kudos to all the private airlines for standing by in this incident.
 
Gaikwad was at fault and there is no reason why he and his party should not apologise to that employee as well as He needs to be taught a lesson; for that taking a train every time he wants to travel should do it. If he gets away without punishment it will set a bad precedent for other political representatives.
 
There is often talk that the government should keep an arm’s length from public sector undertakings where it has a stake. By trying to interfere in the episode, the government is not taking the right step. It should introspect instead of trying to shield an MP or its allies.
 
I agree with the editorial’s view that it is purely the prerogative of an airline to draw up a no-fly list; the government should not interfere in it
Bal Govind   Noida
can be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to: 
The Editor, Business Standard
Nehru House, 4 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg 
New Delhi 110 002 
Fax: (011) 23720201  ·  E-mail: letters@bsmail.in
All must have a postal address and telephone number

Letters: Interference not needed

Gaikwad was at fault and there is no reason why he and his party should not apologise to employee

Gaikwad was at fault and there is no reason why he and his party should not apologise to employee With reference to the editorial, “Does not fly”, Member of Parliament (MP) Ravindra Gaikwad’s conduct was as unbecoming as the government’s plan to finalise rules about the airlines’ no-fly list and the Lok Sabha Speaker’s acceptance of a privilege motion of the on this issue.
 
The has been an ally of the in Maharashtra, but that does not mean the latter should ignore the unacceptable behaviour of a MP.
 
By trying to draft guidelines for a no-fly list, the government has shown apathy towards the employee who was at the receiving end of Gaikwad’s misbehaviour. Kudos to all the private airlines for standing by in this incident.
 
Gaikwad was at fault and there is no reason why he and his party should not apologise to that employee as well as He needs to be taught a lesson; for that taking a train every time he wants to travel should do it. If he gets away without punishment it will set a bad precedent for other political representatives.
 
There is often talk that the government should keep an arm’s length from public sector undertakings where it has a stake. By trying to interfere in the episode, the government is not taking the right step. It should introspect instead of trying to shield an MP or its allies.
 
I agree with the editorial’s view that it is purely the prerogative of an airline to draw up a no-fly list; the government should not interfere in it
Bal Govind   Noida
can be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to: 
The Editor, Business Standard
Nehru House, 4 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg 
New Delhi 110 002 
Fax: (011) 23720201  ·  E-mail: letters@bsmail.in
All must have a postal address and telephone number
image
Business Standard
177 22