Triple Talaq: All India Muslim Personal Law Board opposes petitions in SC

Claims an order against triple talaq will be infringement on right to follow and profess a religion

ANI  |  New Delhi 

Huge gathering of Muslims during 25th All India Muslim Personal Law Board Conference at Park Circus Maidan in Kolkata. Photo: PTI
File photo of a huge gathering of Muslims during the 25th All India Muslim Personal Law Board Conference at Park Circus Maidan in Kolkata. Photo: PTI

The All Muslim Personal Board (AIMPLB) has opposed the public interest ligitation filed against the controversial in the Supreme Court, stating that against Muslim Board is 'not maintainable'.

The Muslim body has claimed that any order against would be an infringement on their right to follow and profess any religion.



It has also been contended that the petitions are based on an incorrect understanding of Muslim Personal Any legislative reform, they say, must be sensitive to the cultural context of India, adding that reforms in other countries can't be applied to The next hearing in this case is likely to be on March 30.

Earlier this week, over a million Muslims from across had signed a to end the controversial divorce practice of

The was started by the Muslim Rashtriya Manch (MRM), an Islamic organisation affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), adding that the positive response to the has been linked with the Bharatiya Janata Patry's recent success in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

Several women have filed a before the apex seeking the quashing of the practice.

The Central Government has also told the top that it is against gender injustice and for equality between men and women under the Constitution.

However, the All Muslim Personal Board (AIMPLB) defended the practice, saying it is better to divorce a woman than kill her.

Last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi asserted that he favoured the discontinuation of 'triple talaq', stating that "lives of Muslim women cannot be allowed to be destroyed by "

He also targeted the opposition for 'politicising' the issue and supporting a gender discriminatory practice to appease their vote banks.

Triple Talaq: All India Muslim Personal Law Board opposes petitions in SC

Claims an order against triple talaq will be infringement on right to follow and profess a religion

Claims an order against triple talaq will be infringement on right to follow and profess a religion

The All Muslim Personal Board (AIMPLB) has opposed the public interest ligitation filed against the controversial in the Supreme Court, stating that against Muslim Board is 'not maintainable'.

The Muslim body has claimed that any order against would be an infringement on their right to follow and profess any religion.

It has also been contended that the petitions are based on an incorrect understanding of Muslim Personal Any legislative reform, they say, must be sensitive to the cultural context of India, adding that reforms in other countries can't be applied to The next hearing in this case is likely to be on March 30.

Earlier this week, over a million Muslims from across had signed a to end the controversial divorce practice of

The was started by the Muslim Rashtriya Manch (MRM), an Islamic organisation affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), adding that the positive response to the has been linked with the Bharatiya Janata Patry's recent success in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

Several women have filed a before the apex seeking the quashing of the practice.

The Central Government has also told the top that it is against gender injustice and for equality between men and women under the Constitution.

However, the All Muslim Personal Board (AIMPLB) defended the practice, saying it is better to divorce a woman than kill her.

Last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi asserted that he favoured the discontinuation of 'triple talaq', stating that "lives of Muslim women cannot be allowed to be destroyed by "

He also targeted the opposition for 'politicising' the issue and supporting a gender discriminatory practice to appease their vote banks.

image
Business Standard
177 22