CCI slaps Rs 591 crore penalty on Coal India

Penalty amount of Rs 591 cr translates to 1% of Coal India's average turnover for 3-year period

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

coal, coal India,
.

Competition Commission on Friday imposed a fine of Rs 591 crore on state-owned India for having discriminatory conditions in fuel supply pacts.

Apart from directing the company to "cease and desist" from anti-competitive practices, the watchdog has ordered modification in the agreements.

In a 56-page order, the watchdog has found the company violating competition norms by "imposing unfair/ discriminatory conditions in the matter of supply of non- coking to power producers".

Further, (CCI) said that India did not "evolve/ draft/ finalise the terms and conditions of FSAs through a mutual bilateral process and the same were imposed upon the buyers through a unilateral conduct".

The penalty amount of Rs 591.01 crore translates to one per cent of India's average turnover for the three-year period from 2009-10 to 2011-12.

This is the second order by the on the complaints after its first ruling, passed in December 2013, was set aside by the (Compat).

Setting aside the first order, where had imposed a penalty of Rs 1,773 crore on India, the tribunal also asked the regulator to take a fresh look at the allegations.

After having a fresh look, has imposed a reduced penalty of Rs 591 crore on the behemoth.

The complaints were filed against India and its three subsidiaries -- Mahanadi Coalfields, South Eastern Coalfields and Western Coalfields. They were filed by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company and Gujarat State Electricity Corporation.

In today's order, the regulator has asked India to modify the Fuel Supply Agreements (FSAs) and also ensure that uniformity between old and new power producers as well as between private and PSU power producers.

Even though India enjoys operational freedom on commercial matters, said its conduct is constrained by directions received from various stakeholders including and Power Ministries.

"... All of whom exert influence and are involved in making decisions that impact various aspects of India Ltd's business," the order said.

The regulator also noted that the company decides on pricing of keeping in mind the larger public interest and its social obligations.

Notwithstanding the overarching policy and regulatory environment within which India has to operate, it has sufficient flexibility and functional independence in carrying out its commercial and contractual affairs, the order noted.

India has also been directed to incorporate suitable modifications in the fuel supply agreements to provide for a fair and equitable sampling and testing procedure.

"Keeping in mind the continuous steps taken by India Ltd in resolving issues with stakeholders, the has drastically reduced the penalty amount to Rs 591.01 crore as opposed to a previous amount of Rs 1,773 crore," Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (SAM & Co) said in a statement.

SAM & Co, which acted as the legal advisor to India, said this is for the first time that the has reduced penalty in a case of remand.

CCI slaps Rs 591 crore penalty on Coal India

Penalty amount of Rs 591 cr translates to 1% of Coal India's average turnover for 3-year period

Penalty amount of Rs 591 cr translates to 1% of Coal India's average turnover for 3-year period
Competition Commission on Friday imposed a fine of Rs 591 crore on state-owned India for having discriminatory conditions in fuel supply pacts.

Apart from directing the company to "cease and desist" from anti-competitive practices, the watchdog has ordered modification in the agreements.

In a 56-page order, the watchdog has found the company violating competition norms by "imposing unfair/ discriminatory conditions in the matter of supply of non- coking to power producers".

Further, (CCI) said that India did not "evolve/ draft/ finalise the terms and conditions of FSAs through a mutual bilateral process and the same were imposed upon the buyers through a unilateral conduct".

The penalty amount of Rs 591.01 crore translates to one per cent of India's average turnover for the three-year period from 2009-10 to 2011-12.

This is the second order by the on the complaints after its first ruling, passed in December 2013, was set aside by the (Compat).

Setting aside the first order, where had imposed a penalty of Rs 1,773 crore on India, the tribunal also asked the regulator to take a fresh look at the allegations.

After having a fresh look, has imposed a reduced penalty of Rs 591 crore on the behemoth.

The complaints were filed against India and its three subsidiaries -- Mahanadi Coalfields, South Eastern Coalfields and Western Coalfields. They were filed by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company and Gujarat State Electricity Corporation.

In today's order, the regulator has asked India to modify the Fuel Supply Agreements (FSAs) and also ensure that uniformity between old and new power producers as well as between private and PSU power producers.

Even though India enjoys operational freedom on commercial matters, said its conduct is constrained by directions received from various stakeholders including and Power Ministries.

"... All of whom exert influence and are involved in making decisions that impact various aspects of India Ltd's business," the order said.

The regulator also noted that the company decides on pricing of keeping in mind the larger public interest and its social obligations.

Notwithstanding the overarching policy and regulatory environment within which India has to operate, it has sufficient flexibility and functional independence in carrying out its commercial and contractual affairs, the order noted.

India has also been directed to incorporate suitable modifications in the fuel supply agreements to provide for a fair and equitable sampling and testing procedure.

"Keeping in mind the continuous steps taken by India Ltd in resolving issues with stakeholders, the has drastically reduced the penalty amount to Rs 591.01 crore as opposed to a previous amount of Rs 1,773 crore," Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (SAM & Co) said in a statement.

SAM & Co, which acted as the legal advisor to India, said this is for the first time that the has reduced penalty in a case of remand.
image
Business Standard
177 22