Tribunal upholds Rs 10,000-crore tax demand on Cairn

An international arbitration proceeding between Cairn and the government might continue

Dilasha Seth & Jyoti Mukul  |  New Delhi 

Cairn

An income-(I-T) tribunal has upheld the much-discussed capital gains demand of Rs 10,247 crore on British oil major Cairn, under the controversial retrospective amendment to the law.

In an order on Thursday, the Tribunal (ITAT) here has, however, given relief to the company on interest charges of Rs 18,800 for delayed payment of tax, on the ground that this was a retrospective levy. 

The will have to be paid by the company unless it decides to challenge the order in a high court, said experts. Alongside, an international arbitration proceeding between and the government might continue. 

The ITAT said keeping the issue unnecessarily pending on the plea that a related case was under international arbitration would not be proper, as there was no timeline available about the disposal of the latter case. Also, ITAT observed, its ruling could well be applied to the arbitration proceeding.

A person in the know said final hearings on the arbitration matter would happen in January 2018.

While experts say the order will not go down well with foreign investors, the I-T department officials said this will bolster India's position in the international arbitration tribunal.

“(Upholding of) this demand is not likely to go down well with foreign investors,” said Rakesh Nangia, managing partner at legal entity Nangia & Co.

The liability was under section 9(1) (i) of the This says an indirect transfer of assets situated in India would be liable to be taxed in this country if the value of such assets exceeds Rs 10 crore and represents at least half the total value of assets owned by the company. Naveen Wadhwa of Taxmann says any such business reorganisation that satisfies this section would be liable to be taxed in India. An official spokesperson of Energy Plc said the company had no comments to offer.

An I-T official said it is clear that layers of were created by only for this transaction.

“It was a very deliberate attempt to evade taxes. It is a big decision for the department. All wings of the department, including assessment, board, dispute resolution and officers, worked closely and in a coordinated manner to present a good case before the ITAT,” he said. 

The demand was in respect of UK transferring shares of India Holdings to India, as part of an internal group reorganisation in 2006-07. This gave rise to different interpretations on whether the UK-based company made capital gains, preceding an initial public offering (IPO) of shares by India. 

The I-T department contended UK made a capital gain of Rs 24,503.5 crore. Before the India IPO, the India operations of Energy were owned by a company called India Holdings-Cayman Island and its subsidiaries. India Holdings was a fully owned subsidiary of UK Holdings, in turn a fully owned subsidiary of Energy. 

At the time of the IPO, ownership of the India assets was transferred from UK Holdings to a new company, India. In 2006, India acquired the entire share capital of India Holdings from UK Holdings.  In exchange, 69 per cent of the shares in India were issued to UK Holdings. Hence, Energy, through UK Holdings, held 69 per cent in India.

Later, in 2011, Energy sold India to mining billionaire Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group, barring a minor stake of 9.8 per cent. It wanted to sell the residual stake as well but was barred by the I-T department from doing so. The government also froze payment of dividend by India to Energy; it recently agreed to lift that freeze.

Slippery slope on taxes
  • Evidential hearings expected to take place in January 2018
  • seeks restitution for losses resulting from attachment of its shares in Coal India
  • seeks $5.5-billion damages from India
  • asked the arbitration panel at Geneva to order India to withdraw its demand
  • Arbitration proceeding commenced in February 2016 after an assessment order in January 2016
  • wing in March 2014 froze Cairn’s holding in India
  • In January 2014, Energy received notice on withholding tax

Tribunal upholds Rs 10,000-crore tax demand on Cairn

An international arbitration proceeding between Cairn and the government might continue

An international arbitration proceeding between Cairn and the government might continue
An income-(I-T) tribunal has upheld the much-discussed capital gains demand of Rs 10,247 crore on British oil major Cairn, under the controversial retrospective amendment to the law.

In an order on Thursday, the Tribunal (ITAT) here has, however, given relief to the company on interest charges of Rs 18,800 for delayed payment of tax, on the ground that this was a retrospective levy. 

The will have to be paid by the company unless it decides to challenge the order in a high court, said experts. Alongside, an international arbitration proceeding between and the government might continue. 

The ITAT said keeping the issue unnecessarily pending on the plea that a related case was under international arbitration would not be proper, as there was no timeline available about the disposal of the latter case. Also, ITAT observed, its ruling could well be applied to the arbitration proceeding.

A person in the know said final hearings on the arbitration matter would happen in January 2018.

While experts say the order will not go down well with foreign investors, the I-T department officials said this will bolster India's position in the international arbitration tribunal.

“(Upholding of) this demand is not likely to go down well with foreign investors,” said Rakesh Nangia, managing partner at legal entity Nangia & Co.

The liability was under section 9(1) (i) of the This says an indirect transfer of assets situated in India would be liable to be taxed in this country if the value of such assets exceeds Rs 10 crore and represents at least half the total value of assets owned by the company. Naveen Wadhwa of Taxmann says any such business reorganisation that satisfies this section would be liable to be taxed in India. An official spokesperson of Energy Plc said the company had no comments to offer.

An I-T official said it is clear that layers of were created by only for this transaction.

“It was a very deliberate attempt to evade taxes. It is a big decision for the department. All wings of the department, including assessment, board, dispute resolution and officers, worked closely and in a coordinated manner to present a good case before the ITAT,” he said. 

The demand was in respect of UK transferring shares of India Holdings to India, as part of an internal group reorganisation in 2006-07. This gave rise to different interpretations on whether the UK-based company made capital gains, preceding an initial public offering (IPO) of shares by India. 

The I-T department contended UK made a capital gain of Rs 24,503.5 crore. Before the India IPO, the India operations of Energy were owned by a company called India Holdings-Cayman Island and its subsidiaries. India Holdings was a fully owned subsidiary of UK Holdings, in turn a fully owned subsidiary of Energy. 

At the time of the IPO, ownership of the India assets was transferred from UK Holdings to a new company, India. In 2006, India acquired the entire share capital of India Holdings from UK Holdings.  In exchange, 69 per cent of the shares in India were issued to UK Holdings. Hence, Energy, through UK Holdings, held 69 per cent in India.

Later, in 2011, Energy sold India to mining billionaire Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group, barring a minor stake of 9.8 per cent. It wanted to sell the residual stake as well but was barred by the I-T department from doing so. The government also froze payment of dividend by India to Energy; it recently agreed to lift that freeze.

Slippery slope on taxes
  • Evidential hearings expected to take place in January 2018
  • seeks restitution for losses resulting from attachment of its shares in Coal India
  • seeks $5.5-billion damages from India
  • asked the arbitration panel at Geneva to order India to withdraw its demand
  • Arbitration proceeding commenced in February 2016 after an assessment order in January 2016
  • wing in March 2014 froze Cairn’s holding in India
  • In January 2014, Energy received notice on withholding tax

image
Business Standard
177 22