SC warrant against me unconstitutional: Justice Karnan

IANS  |  Kolkata/New Delhi 

Justice C.S. Karnan of the Calcutta High on Friday said the Supreme Court-issued bailable warrant against him in a contempt case was "unconstitutional" and a deliberate attempt "to ruin my life" as a Dalit judge.

"The bailable warrant issued today ... will be stayed. They have no locus standi to issue a warrant against me. It is unconstitutional," he told the media in Kolkata, hours after a seven-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar asked the West Bengal police chief to serve the warrant to Justice Karnan and sought his presence before it on March 31.

Karnan said it was an "arbitrary order deliberately issued against me to ruin my life.

"A Dalit judge (is being) prevented from doing work in a public office. That is atrocity."

He alleged that he was being targeted after he made representation to Prime Minister Narendra Modi about some judges who had committed "illegal activities".

Justice Karnan had in January named 20 "corrupt judges", seeking probe against them to curb "high corruption" in the Indian judiciary. The letter invited contempt proceedings against him.

He said as a "separate constitutional office... I am giving order to the Director (of) Central Bureau of Investigation to conduct detailed inquiry on the basis of my order against the erring judges".

Earlier, the Supreme ordered warrant against him after Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi told the apex that Justice Karnan had refused to appear before the

The said the Registry of the Supreme had received a text message from Justice Karnan on March 8, "seeking a meeting with CJI and other judges so as to discuss certain administrative issues which primarily seem to reflect allegations against certain judges.

"The letter can't be considered as response to contempt petition. In view of the above, there is no alternative but to ensure his presence in the by issuing bailable warrant."

--IANS

spk-sar/mr

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

SC warrant against me unconstitutional: Justice Karnan

Justice C.S. Karnan of the Calcutta High Court on Friday said the Supreme Court-issued bailable warrant against him in a contempt case was "unconstitutional" and a deliberate attempt "to ruin my life" as a Dalit judge.

Justice C.S. Karnan of the Calcutta High on Friday said the Supreme Court-issued bailable warrant against him in a contempt case was "unconstitutional" and a deliberate attempt "to ruin my life" as a Dalit judge.

"The bailable warrant issued today ... will be stayed. They have no locus standi to issue a warrant against me. It is unconstitutional," he told the media in Kolkata, hours after a seven-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar asked the West Bengal police chief to serve the warrant to Justice Karnan and sought his presence before it on March 31.

Karnan said it was an "arbitrary order deliberately issued against me to ruin my life.

"A Dalit judge (is being) prevented from doing work in a public office. That is atrocity."

He alleged that he was being targeted after he made representation to Prime Minister Narendra Modi about some judges who had committed "illegal activities".

Justice Karnan had in January named 20 "corrupt judges", seeking probe against them to curb "high corruption" in the Indian judiciary. The letter invited contempt proceedings against him.

He said as a "separate constitutional office... I am giving order to the Director (of) Central Bureau of Investigation to conduct detailed inquiry on the basis of my order against the erring judges".

Earlier, the Supreme ordered warrant against him after Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi told the apex that Justice Karnan had refused to appear before the

The said the Registry of the Supreme had received a text message from Justice Karnan on March 8, "seeking a meeting with CJI and other judges so as to discuss certain administrative issues which primarily seem to reflect allegations against certain judges.

"The letter can't be considered as response to contempt petition. In view of the above, there is no alternative but to ensure his presence in the by issuing bailable warrant."

--IANS

spk-sar/mr

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22