GST: E-commerce cos against tax collection at source; 1% levy a dampener

The draft law proposed a levy of 1% without any limit, cos say this will not solve any problems

Karan Choudhury & Arup Roychoudhury  |  New Delhi 

e-commerce, ecommerce, online
Photo: Shutterstock

For Indian players, the proposed collected at source (TCS) on them under the much-awaited goods and services (GST) being capped at one percent, failed to bring much cheer into the sector marred by valuation tumbles and massive layoffs.

According to industry experts, while the is on the right track with the decision of Council to the percentage, the problem is with itself.

The draft law proposed a of one percent without any limit and also said that the in the law would ensure the remains below that level.

Many said the whole concept of collection at source is flawed and just capping the percentage would not solve any problems. 

"We enable several lakh small and medium business to digitisation their businesses and become part of the formal economy both online and offline. is a welcome piece of legislation and accelerates our ability to extend economic inclusion to the masses of India. But we feel that we are being asked to carry a larger burden of compliance which impacts our cost of doing business, for example, mandatory collection, mandatory registration for online micro small business unlike their offline counterparts," Sanjay Sethi, co-founder and CEO, Shopclues.com.

According to the top boss, around Rs 400 crore of working capital would get locked up every year at the current scale. He added that it would deter small and medium enterprises and sellers from selling on platform or go digital in their business.

Under TCS, marketplaces will have to deduct a portion of the amount payable to sellers on their platform and remit it to the

"We believe we have made a significant difference to the whole ecosystem... There are hundreds and thousands of sellers online and a lot of them are entrepreneurs, some of them are offline retailers... we have come a long way in creating this ecosystem," co-founder Sachin Bansal had said earlier.

Industry experts also pointed out that while one percent is fine, the problem is with compliance. "collected at source (TCS) would increase a lot of compliance, a lot more disclosures would have to be made and costs would be high as the volume of data would increase. The intention of the is right and one percent is fine, having said that it would mean an increase in compliance for the sector," Amarjeet Singh, Partner, Tax, KPMG in India.

Senior officials said that the decision to for at one per cent likely stems from meetings between industry representatives and policy-makers. "It has likely been offered as a sort of a sweetener, so to speak, for players," said an official. Though

is a direct which comes under the jurisdiction of the central board of direct taxes (CBDT), changes can be made to it under draft laws. It will, however, require concurrent amendments in the income act as well, sources said.

GST: E-commerce cos against tax collection at source; 1% levy a dampener

The draft law proposed a levy of 1% without any limit, cos say this will not solve any problems

For Indian ecommerce players, the proposed tax collected at source (TCS) on them under the much awaited goods and services tax (GST) being capped at one percent, failed to bring much cheer into the sector marred by valuation tumbles and massive layoffs.According to industry experts, while the government is on the right track with the decision GST Council to capping the percentage, the problem is with TCS itself.The draft law proposed a levy of one percent without any limit and also saidthat the cap in the law would ensure the levy remains below that level.Manyecommerce companies said that the whole concept of tax collection at source isflawed and just capping the percentage would not solve any problems. "We enableseveral lakh small and medium business to digitization their businesses andbecome part of the formal economy both online and offline. GST is a welcomepiece of tax legislation and accelerates our ability to extend economicinclusion to the masses of India. But we feel that we ..

For Indian players, the proposed collected at source (TCS) on them under the much-awaited goods and services (GST) being capped at one percent, failed to bring much cheer into the sector marred by valuation tumbles and massive layoffs.

According to industry experts, while the is on the right track with the decision of Council to the percentage, the problem is with itself.

The draft law proposed a of one percent without any limit and also said that the in the law would ensure the remains below that level.

Many said the whole concept of collection at source is flawed and just capping the percentage would not solve any problems. 

"We enable several lakh small and medium business to digitisation their businesses and become part of the formal economy both online and offline. is a welcome piece of legislation and accelerates our ability to extend economic inclusion to the masses of India. But we feel that we are being asked to carry a larger burden of compliance which impacts our cost of doing business, for example, mandatory collection, mandatory registration for online micro small business unlike their offline counterparts," Sanjay Sethi, co-founder and CEO, Shopclues.com.

According to the top boss, around Rs 400 crore of working capital would get locked up every year at the current scale. He added that it would deter small and medium enterprises and sellers from selling on platform or go digital in their business.

Under TCS, marketplaces will have to deduct a portion of the amount payable to sellers on their platform and remit it to the

"We believe we have made a significant difference to the whole ecosystem... There are hundreds and thousands of sellers online and a lot of them are entrepreneurs, some of them are offline retailers... we have come a long way in creating this ecosystem," co-founder Sachin Bansal had said earlier.

Industry experts also pointed out that while one percent is fine, the problem is with compliance. "collected at source (TCS) would increase a lot of compliance, a lot more disclosures would have to be made and costs would be high as the volume of data would increase. The intention of the is right and one percent is fine, having said that it would mean an increase in compliance for the sector," Amarjeet Singh, Partner, Tax, KPMG in India.

Senior officials said that the decision to for at one per cent likely stems from meetings between industry representatives and policy-makers. "It has likely been offered as a sort of a sweetener, so to speak, for players," said an official. Though

is a direct which comes under the jurisdiction of the central board of direct taxes (CBDT), changes can be made to it under draft laws. It will, however, require concurrent amendments in the income act as well, sources said.

image
Business Standard
177 22