Uber loses court battle which could cost it London drivers

Public body TfL said that drivers should have to prove their ability to communicate in English

Reuters  |  London 

Uber

Taxi app lost a court battle on Friday to stop a regulator from imposing strict new english reading and writing standards on private hire drivers, the latest setback for the firm which could mean the loss of thousands of workers.

San Francisco-based Uber, which allows people to book journeys on their smartphone, has faced bans and protests around the world as regulators play catch-up with technology that threatens to disrupt traditional operators.

The company took legal action in August after public body Transport for (TfL) said that drivers should have to prove their ability to communicate in English, including to a standard of reading and writing which said was too high.

On Friday, a High Court judge rejected Uber's claim.

"are entitled to require private hire drivers to demonstrate English language compliance," Judge John Mitting said.

In the High Court, had cited data that the language rules could mean about 33,000 private hire drivers out of a total of 110,000 operating in would fail to renew their licences over the next few years.

TfL's new rules are partly a response to protests from drivers of London's famous black cabs, who are concerned that Uber's over 30,000 drivers are undermining their business model by not meeting the same standards.

"Writing an essay has nothing to do with communicating with passengers or getting them safely from A to B," Uber's General Manager in said in a statement.

"We intend to appeal this unfair and disproportionate new rule."

In the case, did manage to overturn two other proposals for drivers to have permanent private hire insurance and that it should operate a 24x7 call centre.

The decision on the language test is the latest setback for in after a British tribunal ruled in October it should treat two drivers as workers and pay them the minimum wage and holiday pay. is seeking to appeal the ruling.

Chief Executive Travis Kalanick has made headlines this week for getting into an argument with a driver for the ride service who complained about pay rates.

Some unions and regulators in are trying to rein in the so-called 'gig economy', where individuals work for multiple employers day-to-day without having a fixed contract, which advocates say offers flexible working but critics say is exploitative.

British law firm Leigh Day is advising drivers at takeaway foods delivery firm Deliveroo on the possibility of taking legal action to gain workers' rights such as the minimum wage.

On Friday, Mayor welcomed the court's decision and said he was focused on better regulating the sector.

"From my first day at City Hall I have been determined to drive up standards and improve safety for every taxi and private hire passenger travelling in London," he said.

Uber loses court battle which could cost it London drivers

Public body TfL said that drivers should have to prove their ability to communicate in English

Public body TfL said that drivers should have to prove their ability to communicate in English

Taxi app lost a court battle on Friday to stop a regulator from imposing strict new english reading and writing standards on private hire drivers, the latest setback for the firm which could mean the loss of thousands of workers.

San Francisco-based Uber, which allows people to book journeys on their smartphone, has faced bans and protests around the world as regulators play catch-up with technology that threatens to disrupt traditional operators.

The company took legal action in August after public body Transport for (TfL) said that drivers should have to prove their ability to communicate in English, including to a standard of reading and writing which said was too high.

On Friday, a High Court judge rejected Uber's claim.

"are entitled to require private hire drivers to demonstrate English language compliance," Judge John Mitting said.

In the High Court, had cited data that the language rules could mean about 33,000 private hire drivers out of a total of 110,000 operating in would fail to renew their licences over the next few years.

TfL's new rules are partly a response to protests from drivers of London's famous black cabs, who are concerned that Uber's over 30,000 drivers are undermining their business model by not meeting the same standards.

"Writing an essay has nothing to do with communicating with passengers or getting them safely from A to B," Uber's General Manager in said in a statement.

"We intend to appeal this unfair and disproportionate new rule."

In the case, did manage to overturn two other proposals for drivers to have permanent private hire insurance and that it should operate a 24x7 call centre.

The decision on the language test is the latest setback for in after a British tribunal ruled in October it should treat two drivers as workers and pay them the minimum wage and holiday pay. is seeking to appeal the ruling.

Chief Executive Travis Kalanick has made headlines this week for getting into an argument with a driver for the ride service who complained about pay rates.

Some unions and regulators in are trying to rein in the so-called 'gig economy', where individuals work for multiple employers day-to-day without having a fixed contract, which advocates say offers flexible working but critics say is exploitative.

British law firm Leigh Day is advising drivers at takeaway foods delivery firm Deliveroo on the possibility of taking legal action to gain workers' rights such as the minimum wage.

On Friday, Mayor welcomed the court's decision and said he was focused on better regulating the sector.

"From my first day at City Hall I have been determined to drive up standards and improve safety for every taxi and private hire passenger travelling in London," he said.

image
Business Standard
177 22