'Concession on Tawang can resolve India-China border dispute'

Press Trust of India  |  Beijing 

The border dispute between and can be resolved if accepts Beijing's claim over strategically vital Tawang region in Arunachal Pradesh, China's former top diplomat has said, but Indian officials dismissed it as neither practical nor possible.

Dai Bingguo, who served as the China's boundary negotiator with from 2003 to 2013, told Chinese media, "If the Indian side takes care of China's concerns in the eastern sector of their border, the Chinese side will respond accordingly and address India's concerns elsewhere."



Elaborating China's stand, Dai who conducted border talks with five Indian Special Representatives starting with in 2003 said, "The disputed territory in the eastern sector of the China-boundary, including Tawang, is inalienable from China's in terms of cultural background and administrative jurisdiction."

He said that colonial British which drew the"McMahon Line" accepted Beijing's claim on Tawang.

has rejected "McMahon Line" in India's case but accepted it in settling boundary dispute with Myanmar.

"Even British colonialists who drew the illegal McMahon Line respected China's jurisdiction over Tawang and admitted that Tawang was part of China's Tibet," Dai told the China-Dialogue magazine.

Dai was China's top diplomat and held the post of State Councillor in the previous Hu Jintao administration.

His interview was published by the magazine in its January edition ahead of India-Strategic Dialogue held here last month co-chaired by Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar.

Dai, regarded as a wily negotiator, did not specify where is willing to make a concession along the 3,488-km long (LAC).

He also did not specify this in the book he wrote in Chinese language on the border talks.

Indian officials, however, said Dai's proposal is neither practical nor possible for to accept considering that Tawang is an integral part of and has sent representatives to Parliament in every election since 1950.

In his interview, Dai said essential nature of the China-boundary question is the "need to correct wrongs" made by colonialists and to restore fairness and justice.

"For historical reasons, now controls the majority of the disputed territory. The boundary question was not created by or India, so we shouldn't be inheriting it and letting the ghosts of colonialism continue to haunt our bilateral relations," he said.

Though published afresh in Chinese media, has been making such a demand for concession for long.

Former National Security Advisor Shivshankar Menon who was India's Special Representative for border talks and held several rounds of talks with Dai until the present NSA Ajit Doval took over in 2014, has mentioned the issue in his recently released book "Choices: Inside the Making of India's Foreign Policy".
While demanded concessions in the Western sector

before the 1962 war, it changed the line to East after 1980s.

"Chinese officials began saying in the 1980s that would compromise only if made major adjustments first, adding that once indicated concessions in the East, would indicate concessions in the West," Menon wrote in the book.

"In 1985, specified that the concession it was seeking in the East was Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh, something that any of would find difficult to accept, as this was settled area that had sent representatives to every Indian Parliament since 1950," he wrote.

"The Indian Supreme Court also held in the Berubari case in 1956 that the could not cede sovereign territory to another without a constitutional amendment, though it could made adjustments and rectifications in the boundaries of India," Menon wrote in the book, highlighting India's problem in accepting China's demand.

Apparently China's stand on the border settlement was different earlier lacking consistency.

Menon wrote that former Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai during his visit to in 1960"suggested that might recognise the McMahon line boundary in the East in return to accepting China's claim in the West" to provide strategic depth for along the Aksai Chin road between Xinjiang and Tibet, which is now National Highway 219.

Menon said for the first time had Chinese troops at the border only after the People's Liberation of Army (PLA) took control of

After the occupation of Aksai Chin area in the 1962 war, China's stand reported to have changed.

While says the border dispute covers which it claims as Southern Tibet, asserts that the dispute covered Aksai Chin area.

'Concession on Tawang can resolve India-China border dispute'

The border dispute between China and India can be resolved if New Delhi accepts Beijing's claim over strategically vital Tawang region in Arunachal Pradesh, China's former top diplomat has said, but Indian officials dismissed it as neither practical nor possible. Dai Bingguo, who served as the China's boundary negotiator with India from 2003 to 2013, told Chinese media, "If the Indian side takes care of China's concerns in the eastern sector of their border, the Chinese side will respond accordingly and address India's concerns elsewhere." Elaborating China's stand, Dai who conducted border talks with five Indian Special Representatives starting with Brajesh Mishra in 2003 said, "The disputed territory in the eastern sector of the China-India boundary, including Tawang, is inalienable from China's Tibet in terms of cultural background and administrative jurisdiction." He said that colonial British government which drew the"McMahon Line" accepted Beijing's claim on Tawang. China ... The border dispute between and can be resolved if accepts Beijing's claim over strategically vital Tawang region in Arunachal Pradesh, China's former top diplomat has said, but Indian officials dismissed it as neither practical nor possible.

Dai Bingguo, who served as the China's boundary negotiator with from 2003 to 2013, told Chinese media, "If the Indian side takes care of China's concerns in the eastern sector of their border, the Chinese side will respond accordingly and address India's concerns elsewhere."

Elaborating China's stand, Dai who conducted border talks with five Indian Special Representatives starting with in 2003 said, "The disputed territory in the eastern sector of the China-boundary, including Tawang, is inalienable from China's in terms of cultural background and administrative jurisdiction."

He said that colonial British which drew the"McMahon Line" accepted Beijing's claim on Tawang.

has rejected "McMahon Line" in India's case but accepted it in settling boundary dispute with Myanmar.

"Even British colonialists who drew the illegal McMahon Line respected China's jurisdiction over Tawang and admitted that Tawang was part of China's Tibet," Dai told the China-Dialogue magazine.

Dai was China's top diplomat and held the post of State Councillor in the previous Hu Jintao administration.

His interview was published by the magazine in its January edition ahead of India-Strategic Dialogue held here last month co-chaired by Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar.

Dai, regarded as a wily negotiator, did not specify where is willing to make a concession along the 3,488-km long (LAC).

He also did not specify this in the book he wrote in Chinese language on the border talks.

Indian officials, however, said Dai's proposal is neither practical nor possible for to accept considering that Tawang is an integral part of and has sent representatives to Parliament in every election since 1950.

In his interview, Dai said essential nature of the China-boundary question is the "need to correct wrongs" made by colonialists and to restore fairness and justice.

"For historical reasons, now controls the majority of the disputed territory. The boundary question was not created by or India, so we shouldn't be inheriting it and letting the ghosts of colonialism continue to haunt our bilateral relations," he said.

Though published afresh in Chinese media, has been making such a demand for concession for long.

Former National Security Advisor Shivshankar Menon who was India's Special Representative for border talks and held several rounds of talks with Dai until the present NSA Ajit Doval took over in 2014, has mentioned the issue in his recently released book "Choices: Inside the Making of India's Foreign Policy".
While demanded concessions in the Western sector

before the 1962 war, it changed the line to East after 1980s.

"Chinese officials began saying in the 1980s that would compromise only if made major adjustments first, adding that once indicated concessions in the East, would indicate concessions in the West," Menon wrote in the book.

"In 1985, specified that the concession it was seeking in the East was Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh, something that any of would find difficult to accept, as this was settled area that had sent representatives to every Indian Parliament since 1950," he wrote.

"The Indian Supreme Court also held in the Berubari case in 1956 that the could not cede sovereign territory to another without a constitutional amendment, though it could made adjustments and rectifications in the boundaries of India," Menon wrote in the book, highlighting India's problem in accepting China's demand.

Apparently China's stand on the border settlement was different earlier lacking consistency.

Menon wrote that former Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai during his visit to in 1960"suggested that might recognise the McMahon line boundary in the East in return to accepting China's claim in the West" to provide strategic depth for along the Aksai Chin road between Xinjiang and Tibet, which is now National Highway 219.

Menon said for the first time had Chinese troops at the border only after the People's Liberation of Army (PLA) took control of

After the occupation of Aksai Chin area in the 1962 war, China's stand reported to have changed.

While says the border dispute covers which it claims as Southern Tibet, asserts that the dispute covered Aksai Chin area.
image
Business Standard
177 22