Last Modified: Fri, Mar 03 2017. 06 17 PM IST

Vijay Mallya case: SC to hear banks’ plea against transfer of $40 million

Justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and U.U. Lalit will hear the matter against Vijay Mallya on 9 March

Subscribe to our newsletter.

PTI
In October last year, the Supreme Court had rapped Vijay Mallya for not making full disclosure of his overseas properties and had asked him to do so within a month. Photo: Reuters
In October last year, the Supreme Court had rapped Vijay Mallya for not making full disclosure of his overseas properties and had asked him to do so within a month. Photo: Reuters

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday said it would hear next week the plea of a consortium of banks that $40 million needed to be brought back, which liquor baron Vijay Mallya had allegedly transferred to his children.

A bench, comprising justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and U.U. Lalit, considered the submission of senior advocate Shyam Divan, representing the consortium led by State Bank of India, that $40 million Mallya had allegedly received from British firm Diageo in February last year and transferred to his children in “flagrant violation” of various judicial orders, including those passed by passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal and the Karnataka High Court.

ALSO READ: Vijay Mallya blames faulty aircraft engines for Kingfisher Airlines collapse

The court decided to hear the matter on 9 March. The banks prayed that orders be passed to “secure the deposit of the said amount of $40 million before this court or the DRT forthwith, pending disposal of the further recovery proceedings.”

The bench, on 11 January, had granted three weeks to Mallya to file an affidavit in response to the plea of banks. Divan said the banks had also filed a plea seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against Mallya. It is a matter of record that Mallya and his firm owe over Rs6,200 crore to the banks and the money should have been deposited here, he had said.

In October last year, the court had rapped Mallya for not making full disclosure of his overseas properties and had asked him to do so within a month. The bench had also pulled up Mallya for not giving details of $40 million which he had allegedly received from British firm Diageo in February last year, saying it was of the “prima facie view” that proper disclosure as per its earlier order was not made.

More From Livemint

First Published: Fri, Mar 03 2017. 06 17 PM IST