Tata, DoCoMo to bury the hatchet, but RBI hurdle remains to be cleared

Settlement terms clear the way for the payment of $1.18 bn, already deposited by Tata Sons.

Sayan Ghosal  |  New Delhi 

Year End Specials, Demonetisation, Tata vs Mistry, Reliance Jio, Tata-DoCoMo, Singur verdict, Vijay Mallya, GST, RIL, ONGC, K-G Basin, Soft Bank, Nikesh Arora, Odd-Even, Kejriwal, Narendra Modi, Ranbaxy, Daiichi Sankyo, Call drops, TRAI

has agreed to settle with a long-standing arbitration dispute over the exit of the Japanese firm from their Indian telecom joint venture.

The two on Tuesday requested the Delhi High Court to conclude legal proceedings and accept the settlement, agreed upon by the two out of court. 

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) had awarded $1.18 billion to Japan’s largest telecom firm in June 2016.

Senior advocate Darius Khambata, on behalf of Tata, said, “withdraws its objections to the enforcement of the arbitration award in favour of

The settlement came within days of the Tata group getting a new chairman in N Chandrasekaran, following the ouster of Cyrus Mistry last year.

According to a statement by Tata Sons, the company had reached the settlement as a gesture of good faith in accordance with its longstanding record of adherence to contractual commitments. 

As part of the understanding, DoCoMo has agreed not to press for enforcement of the award in any other court for six months, within which the two are expected to resolve the issue in line with the terms of the settlement.

According to a statement, the settlement terms clear the way for the payment of $1.18 billion, already deposited by

It will allow DoCoMo to transfer its shares in Tata Teleservices. 

“Today’s agreement is a significant step towards the resolution of this dispute, and DoCoMo is hopeful that the two parties will continue to work together constructively to achieve a resolution. Full satisfaction of the award through the Delhi High Court’s judgment will enable DoCoMo to consider reinvestment of an amount in India, under a new cooperative relationship with Tata Sons,” the statement said.

The two-year-long arbitration proceedings between the two relates to a dispute over inability to buy back NTT DoCoMo’s 26 per cent share in their joint venture (JV) Tata Teleservices, as had been initially agreed upon by the two groups in their JV agreement.

According to the terms of the JV, had been allowed the option of exiting the venture after three years at a pre-determined share price, which were to be bought by or an external buyer to be arranged by the JV partner. 

In 2014, after the collaboration consistently failed in generating the desired returns, decided to exercise its exit option at a time when the share price of Tata Teleservices had plummeted far below the earlier agreed exit agreement. Unable to find a buyer, made an application to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to purchase the shares according to the terms of the venture.

refused the application on the ground that such a transfer could not be made at a pre-determined share price on a later date, according to the existent foreign exchange and securities regulations.

The deadlock resulted in the international arbitral proceedings. LCIA ruled in favour of DoCoMo on June 22 last year.

After the award, Tata had approached once again for permission to comply with the terms of the adjudication, but this application was also rejected by the regulator, leading to the current proceedings in the Delhi High Court. 

With the announcement of this settlement between the two companies, the only hurdle that remains is the objection made by before the court. This will be heard by Justice Muralidhar on March 8, the next date of hearing.

Timeline of events in the NTT Docomo-dispute

November 2008: purchases a 26 per cent stake in the Tata Teleservices for $ 2.22 billion in terms of the joint venture agreement

August 2010: decides not to invest a further $1 billion in the Teleservices venture

July 2014: exercises exit option against on previously agreed terms

November 2014: Unable to find an external buyer, makes an application with to purchase stake
at Rs 58 per share amounting to Rs 27,000 crore

December 2014: deadline to find external buyer/purchase shares expires  

January 2015: approaches London Court of International Arbitration against breach of the joint venture agreement

March 2015: refuses November 2014 application to purchase NTT Docomo’s shares at the pre-determined rates

July 2015: refuses to accept offer to buy stake at fair market value of Rs 23 per share amounting to Rs 11,000 crore (less than half of the previously agreed price)

June 2016: London Court of International Arbitration awards $1.17 in favour of NTT Docomo

July 2016: approaches Delhi High Court to enforce international arbitration award – reiterates former stance against stake-sale via letter issued to agrees to deposit full sum of the award with the Delhi High Court pending final determination

July 2016: obtains London Commercial Court ex-parte order allowing enforcement of award against Tata Son’s UK assets

September 2016: files affidavit opposing the enforcement of the international award in Delhi High Court

October 2016: intervenes in Delhi High Court challenging the enforcement of the award

February 2017: and submit joint settlement plan in the Delhi High Court to put an end to the arbitral dispute  
 

Tata, DoCoMo to bury the hatchet, but RBI hurdle remains to be cleared

Settlement terms clear the way for the payment of $1.18 bn, already deposited by Tata Sons.

Settlement terms clear the way for the payment of $1.18 bn, already deposited by Tata Sons.
has agreed to settle with a long-standing arbitration dispute over the exit of the Japanese firm from their Indian telecom joint venture.

The two on Tuesday requested the Delhi High Court to conclude legal proceedings and accept the settlement, agreed upon by the two out of court. 

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) had awarded $1.18 billion to Japan’s largest telecom firm in June 2016.

Senior advocate Darius Khambata, on behalf of Tata, said, “withdraws its objections to the enforcement of the arbitration award in favour of

The settlement came within days of the Tata group getting a new chairman in N Chandrasekaran, following the ouster of Cyrus Mistry last year.

According to a statement by Tata Sons, the company had reached the settlement as a gesture of good faith in accordance with its longstanding record of adherence to contractual commitments. 

As part of the understanding, DoCoMo has agreed not to press for enforcement of the award in any other court for six months, within which the two are expected to resolve the issue in line with the terms of the settlement.

According to a statement, the settlement terms clear the way for the payment of $1.18 billion, already deposited by

It will allow DoCoMo to transfer its shares in Tata Teleservices. 

“Today’s agreement is a significant step towards the resolution of this dispute, and DoCoMo is hopeful that the two parties will continue to work together constructively to achieve a resolution. Full satisfaction of the award through the Delhi High Court’s judgment will enable DoCoMo to consider reinvestment of an amount in India, under a new cooperative relationship with Tata Sons,” the statement said.

The two-year-long arbitration proceedings between the two relates to a dispute over inability to buy back NTT DoCoMo’s 26 per cent share in their joint venture (JV) Tata Teleservices, as had been initially agreed upon by the two groups in their JV agreement.

According to the terms of the JV, had been allowed the option of exiting the venture after three years at a pre-determined share price, which were to be bought by or an external buyer to be arranged by the JV partner. 

In 2014, after the collaboration consistently failed in generating the desired returns, decided to exercise its exit option at a time when the share price of Tata Teleservices had plummeted far below the earlier agreed exit agreement. Unable to find a buyer, made an application to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to purchase the shares according to the terms of the venture.

refused the application on the ground that such a transfer could not be made at a pre-determined share price on a later date, according to the existent foreign exchange and securities regulations.

The deadlock resulted in the international arbitral proceedings. LCIA ruled in favour of DoCoMo on June 22 last year.

After the award, Tata had approached once again for permission to comply with the terms of the adjudication, but this application was also rejected by the regulator, leading to the current proceedings in the Delhi High Court. 

With the announcement of this settlement between the two companies, the only hurdle that remains is the objection made by before the court. This will be heard by Justice Muralidhar on March 8, the next date of hearing.

Timeline of events in the NTT Docomo-dispute

November 2008: purchases a 26 per cent stake in the Tata Teleservices for $ 2.22 billion in terms of the joint venture agreement

August 2010: decides not to invest a further $1 billion in the Teleservices venture

July 2014: exercises exit option against on previously agreed terms

November 2014: Unable to find an external buyer, makes an application with to purchase stake
at Rs 58 per share amounting to Rs 27,000 crore

December 2014: deadline to find external buyer/purchase shares expires  

January 2015: approaches London Court of International Arbitration against breach of the joint venture agreement

March 2015: refuses November 2014 application to purchase NTT Docomo’s shares at the pre-determined rates

July 2015: refuses to accept offer to buy stake at fair market value of Rs 23 per share amounting to Rs 11,000 crore (less than half of the previously agreed price)

June 2016: London Court of International Arbitration awards $1.17 in favour of NTT Docomo

July 2016: approaches Delhi High Court to enforce international arbitration award – reiterates former stance against stake-sale via letter issued to agrees to deposit full sum of the award with the Delhi High Court pending final determination

July 2016: obtains London Commercial Court ex-parte order allowing enforcement of award against Tata Son’s UK assets

September 2016: files affidavit opposing the enforcement of the international award in Delhi High Court

October 2016: intervenes in Delhi High Court challenging the enforcement of the award

February 2017: and submit joint settlement plan in the Delhi High Court to put an end to the arbitral dispute  
 
image
Business Standard
177 22