S.African court rules against govt plan to pull out of ICC

AFP  |  Johannesburg 

A South African today ruled the government's plan to withdraw from the International Criminal (ICC) was "unconstitutional and invalid", providing a boost to the embattled Hague-based institution.

The has been rocked by threats of withdrawal in recent months, with complaints focusing on its alleged bias against



announced in October it had lodged its decision to pull out with the United Nations, following a dispute over Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir visiting the country in 2015.

South African authorities refused to arrest Bashir despite him facing an arrest warrant over alleged war crimes, saying he had immunity as a head of state.

"The cabinet decision to deliver the notice of withdrawal... Without prior parliamentary approval is unconstitutional and invalid," said judge Phineas Mojapelo in the North Gauteng High

The president and ministers "are ordered forthwith to revoke the notice of withdrawal," he added.

The ruling was a setback for President Jacob Zuma's government, which could appeal.

The opposition Democratic Alliance (DA) party, which was one of the groups that brought the case, welcomed the judgement.

"The withdrawal by the South African from the was irrational and unconstitutional," DA lawmaker James Selfie told AFP.

"We would like to stay in the because we believe that it is consistent with our constitution and with the legacy of Nelson Mandela.

"The should go back to the drawing board and reconsider the thing afresh in light of this judgement."

After the election of President Adama Barrow, The Gambia's new in February asked the UN to halt its process of withdrawal from the

Burundi has also registered to leave, while Kenya is considering the move.

President Bashir has evaded arrest since his indictment in 2009 for alleged war crimes in Sudan's Darfur conflict in which 300,000 people were killed and two million forced to flee their homes.

South Africa's Supreme of Appeal accused the of "disgraceful conduct" over Bashir's visit and ruled that the failure to arrest the Sudanese leader was unlawful.

Currently nine out of the ICC's 10 investigations concern African countries, the other being Georgia.

However experts point out that many of the current investigations -- in the Central African Republic, Uganda, Mali and the Democratic Republic of Congo -- were referred to the by the governments of those states.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

S.African court rules against govt plan to pull out of ICC

A South African court today ruled the government's plan to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC) was "unconstitutional and invalid", providing a boost to the embattled Hague-based institution. The ICC has been rocked by threats of withdrawal in recent months, with complaints focusing on its alleged bias against Africa. South Africa announced in October it had lodged its decision to pull out with the United Nations, following a dispute over Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir visiting the country in 2015. South African authorities refused to arrest Bashir despite him facing an ICC arrest warrant over alleged war crimes, saying he had immunity as a head of state. "The cabinet decision to deliver the notice of withdrawal... Without prior parliamentary approval is unconstitutional and invalid," said judge Phineas Mojapelo in the North Gauteng High Court. The president and ministers "are ordered forthwith to revoke the notice of withdrawal," he added. The court ruling ... A South African today ruled the government's plan to withdraw from the International Criminal (ICC) was "unconstitutional and invalid", providing a boost to the embattled Hague-based institution.

The has been rocked by threats of withdrawal in recent months, with complaints focusing on its alleged bias against

announced in October it had lodged its decision to pull out with the United Nations, following a dispute over Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir visiting the country in 2015.

South African authorities refused to arrest Bashir despite him facing an arrest warrant over alleged war crimes, saying he had immunity as a head of state.

"The cabinet decision to deliver the notice of withdrawal... Without prior parliamentary approval is unconstitutional and invalid," said judge Phineas Mojapelo in the North Gauteng High

The president and ministers "are ordered forthwith to revoke the notice of withdrawal," he added.

The ruling was a setback for President Jacob Zuma's government, which could appeal.

The opposition Democratic Alliance (DA) party, which was one of the groups that brought the case, welcomed the judgement.

"The withdrawal by the South African from the was irrational and unconstitutional," DA lawmaker James Selfie told AFP.

"We would like to stay in the because we believe that it is consistent with our constitution and with the legacy of Nelson Mandela.

"The should go back to the drawing board and reconsider the thing afresh in light of this judgement."

After the election of President Adama Barrow, The Gambia's new in February asked the UN to halt its process of withdrawal from the

Burundi has also registered to leave, while Kenya is considering the move.

President Bashir has evaded arrest since his indictment in 2009 for alleged war crimes in Sudan's Darfur conflict in which 300,000 people were killed and two million forced to flee their homes.

South Africa's Supreme of Appeal accused the of "disgraceful conduct" over Bashir's visit and ruled that the failure to arrest the Sudanese leader was unlawful.

Currently nine out of the ICC's 10 investigations concern African countries, the other being Georgia.

However experts point out that many of the current investigations -- in the Central African Republic, Uganda, Mali and the Democratic Republic of Congo -- were referred to the by the governments of those states.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22