US judge temporarily blocks Donald Trump's travel ban nationwide
SEATTLE: A federal judge's order blocking President Donald Trump's ban on admitting travelers from seven predominantly Muslim countries or any refugees left authorities and advocates wondering what to do Saturday with the people who finally got visas to come to America, only to be turned away.
The White House said it would try to get a court to reinstate the ban that prompted the State Department to cancel visas for 60,000 or more people from the affected countries, causing widespread confusion at airports when some travelers were detained and others sent back.
An internal email circulated among Homeland Security officials Friday night told employees to immediately comply with the judge's ruling. However, the US embassy in Baghdad said Saturday that they're still awaiting guidance on what to tell Iraqis eager to see if their visa restrictions had changed.
``We don't know what the effect will be, but we're working to get more information,'' the embassy told The Associated Press in a statement.
The judge's order was a victory for Washington and Minnesota, which had challenged Trump's directive. US District Judge James Robart in Seattle issued a temporary restraining order, ruling the states had standing. He said they showed their case was likely to succeed.
``The state has met its burden in demonstrating immediate and irreparable injury,'' Robart said.
The White House has argued that it will make the country safer. Spokesman Sean Spicer released a statement late Friday saying the government ``will file an emergency stay of this outrageous order and defend the executive order of the President, which we believe is lawful and appropriate.''
Soon after, a revised statement was sent out that removed the word ``outrageous.''
``The president's order is intended to protect the homeland and he has the constitutional authority and responsibility to protect the American people,'' the statement said.
A State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the matter is under litigation, said Friday: ``We are working closely with the Department of Homeland Security and our legal teams to determine how this affects our operations. We will announce any changes affecting travelers to the United States as soon as that information is available.''
Washington and Minnesota said the temporary ban on entry for people from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya and Yemen and the global suspension of the US refugee program significantly harms residents and effectively mandates discrimination.
After the ruling, Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson said people from the affected countries can now apply for entry to the US
``Judge Robart's decision, effective immediately ... puts a halt to President Trump's unconstitutional and unlawful executive order,'' Ferguson said. ``The law is a powerful thing _ it has the ability to hold everybody accountable to it, and that includes the president of the United States.''
The judge's ruling could be appealed the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals.
Federal attorneys had argued that Congress gave the president authority to make decisions on national security and immigrant entry.
But in his written order released late Friday, Roberts said it's not the court's job to ``create policy or judge the wisdom of any particular policy promoted by the other two branches,'' but rather, to make sure that actions taken by the executive or legislative branches ``comports with our country's laws.''
The White House said it would try to get a court to reinstate the ban that prompted the State Department to cancel visas for 60,000 or more people from the affected countries, causing widespread confusion at airports when some travelers were detained and others sent back.
An internal email circulated among Homeland Security officials Friday night told employees to immediately comply with the judge's ruling. However, the US embassy in Baghdad said Saturday that they're still awaiting guidance on what to tell Iraqis eager to see if their visa restrictions had changed.
``We don't know what the effect will be, but we're working to get more information,'' the embassy told The Associated Press in a statement.
The judge's order was a victory for Washington and Minnesota, which had challenged Trump's directive. US District Judge James Robart in Seattle issued a temporary restraining order, ruling the states had standing. He said they showed their case was likely to succeed.
``The state has met its burden in demonstrating immediate and irreparable injury,'' Robart said.
The White House has argued that it will make the country safer. Spokesman Sean Spicer released a statement late Friday saying the government ``will file an emergency stay of this outrageous order and defend the executive order of the President, which we believe is lawful and appropriate.''
Soon after, a revised statement was sent out that removed the word ``outrageous.''
``The president's order is intended to protect the homeland and he has the constitutional authority and responsibility to protect the American people,'' the statement said.
A State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the matter is under litigation, said Friday: ``We are working closely with the Department of Homeland Security and our legal teams to determine how this affects our operations. We will announce any changes affecting travelers to the United States as soon as that information is available.''
Washington and Minnesota said the temporary ban on entry for people from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya and Yemen and the global suspension of the US refugee program significantly harms residents and effectively mandates discrimination.
After the ruling, Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson said people from the affected countries can now apply for entry to the US
``Judge Robart's decision, effective immediately ... puts a halt to President Trump's unconstitutional and unlawful executive order,'' Ferguson said. ``The law is a powerful thing _ it has the ability to hold everybody accountable to it, and that includes the president of the United States.''
The judge's ruling could be appealed the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals.
Federal attorneys had argued that Congress gave the president authority to make decisions on national security and immigrant entry.
But in his written order released late Friday, Roberts said it's not the court's job to ``create policy or judge the wisdom of any particular policy promoted by the other two branches,'' but rather, to make sure that actions taken by the executive or legislative branches ``comports with our country's laws.''